Open Access

QTc and psychopharmacs: are there any differences between monotherapy and polytherapy

  • Jadranka Čulav Sumić1Email author,
  • Vesna Barić1,
  • Petar Bilić1,
  • Miroslav Herceg1,
  • Mirna Sisek-Šprem1 and
  • Vlado Jukić1
Contributed equally
Annals of General Psychiatry20076:13

DOI: 10.1186/1744-859X-6-13

Received: 22 December 2006

Accepted: 03 May 2007

Published: 03 May 2007

Abstract

Background

Some psychotropic drugs are connected with prolongation of QT interval, increased risk of cardiac arrhythmias and greater incidence of sudden death, especially when used in combination. Concomitant use of antipsychotics and antidepressants is not rare in our clinical practice. The study compares the length of QT interval in patients on monotherapy with an antipsychotic or an antidepressant and patients taking polytherapy (an antipsychotic agent combined with an antidepressant).

Methods

Sixty-one hospitalized women who met the ICD-10 criteria for schizophrenia, schizoaffective psychosis, delusional disorder and mood disorder were included in the study. The monotherapy group was consisted of thirty-two women treated with an antipsychotic or an antidepressant while the polytherapy group was composed of twenty-nine women treated with an antipsychotic agent plus an antidepressant. Two electrocardiograms (ECGs) were obtained for each patient: the first was carried out before the treatment and the second after two weeks of treatment.

Statistical analysis was carried out by SPSS program and included unpaired and paired t test and Fisher's exact test.

Results

Mean baseline QTc values did not differ between the groups (439 ± 22 ms was the same value found in the both groups; unpaired t test, p > 0.5). Mean QTc intervals after two weeks of treatment were also similar (439 ± 24 ms in the monotherapy group and 440 ± 20 ms in the polytherapy group; unpaired t test, p > 0.5). Fisher's exact test did not reveal significant difference in the number of patients with borderline (451–470 ms) or prolonged (> 470 ms) QTc between groups, neither before treatment nor after two weeks of treatment. Twenty two women of the total of sixty one patients (36%) had QTc > 450 ms before applying therapy.

Conclusion

We did not find significant QT prolongation in our patients after two weeks of treatment with antipsychotics and/or antidepressants. The QTc interval length did not differ significantly in the monotherapy and the polytherapy group. More than one third of included women exceeded the threshold value of borderline QTc interval (450 ms) before starting treatment. This finding calls for caution when prescribing drugs to female psychiatric patients, especially if they have other health problems.

Background

Psychotropic drugs are among medications connected with prolongation of the QT interval and greater occurrence of sudden cardiac death [17]. The QT interval is the sequence of the ECG from the beginning of the QRS complex to the end of the T wave and represents the temporal equivalent of ventricular depolarization and repolarization. Its value corrected for heart rate is referred as corrected QT interval (QTc). There is no consensus about the upper physiological limit for QTc [8]. European Medicines Agency quotes different possible upper values (450 ms, 480 ms, and 500 ms) and calls for caution when change from baseline exceeds 30–60 ms [9]. Significant QT prolongation ("long QT syndrome", LQTS), inherited or acquired, is associated with the increased susceptibility to ventricular tachyarrhythmia "torsade de pointes" (TdP) that either resolve spontaneously or deteriorate into ventricular fibrillation and sudden death. In comparison to men, women are at higher risk for developing TdP because the feminine gender is associated with a longer baseline QT interval, perhaps due to differences in circulating sex hormones [1013]. For females, QTc interval values more than 450 ms are commonly used as borderline and those over 470 ms as prolonged [1416].

Congenital forms of LQT syndrome are due to autosomal recessive (Jervell and Lange-Nielsen syndrome) or autosomal dominant (Romano-Ward syndrome) mutations of several genes encoding for cardiac ion channels with consequent disturbances in electrical activity of the heart [1722]. LQTS mutation carriers are present in one of 1000 to 3000 individuals [23].

Acquired long QT syndrome occurs when one or more risk factors, such as drugs that block certain cardiac ion channels, provoke a prolonged QT interval. Common causes of acquired LQTS are several classes of drugs, e.g. Class I and III antiarrhythmics, macrolides antibiotics, antihistamines, antipsychotics and antidepressants [24]. International Registry for Drug-Induced Arrhythmias by the University of Arizona [25] put some antipsychotics among the drugs with the most prominent arrhythmogenic activity (haloperidol, chlorpromazine, pimozide and thioridazine); less capable to induce arrhythmias are clozapine, lithium, quetiapine, risperidone, venlafaxine and ziprasidone. Antidepressants (amitriptyline, clomipramine, citalopram, fluoxetine, paroxetine and sertraline) are at lower risk if they are not combined with other risk factors known to prolong the QT interval (e.g. concomitant therapy with QTc prolonging drugs or inhibitors of cytochrome 450 enzymes, bradycardia, presence of congenital LQTS, and electrolyte imbalance like hypokalaemia and hypocalcaemia). Some studies pointed out the greater possibility for cardiac arrhythmias when antipsychotic drugs are combined with antidepressants [26].

Because concomitant use of antipsychotics and antidepressants are not infrequent in our clinical practice we decided to explore are there any differences in the length of QTc between patients on monotherapy with an antipsychotic or an antidepressant and patients treated with combination of these drugs (an antipsychotic plus an antidepressant).

Methods

A prospective investigation was performed in Psychiatric hospital Vrapče, Zagreb. Sixty one patients, all women, were included in the study, as consecutively received patients from January to September 2006. Informed consents were obtained and the local ethic committee approved the investigation. The patients met the ICD-10 (International Classification of Disease, 10th revision) criteria for schizophrenia, schizoaffective psychosis, delusional disorder and mood disorder. According to patient's history, clinical examination and laboratory tests, patients with liver or renal disorders, cardiovascular disease or psychoactive drugs dependence were not included in the study. The use of depot-therapy in the month prior to investigation and the use of fluoxetine (because of its long half-life) were the exclusion criteria also.

The patients were free of drugs minimum 48 hours before the first ECG and the blood samples were taken. Only the use of lorazepam (up to 7.5 mg/d) was permitted. The second ECG was carried out after two weeks of treatment. The group 1 was on monotherapy (treated with an antipsychotic or an antidepressant). The group 2 was on polytherapy (treated with an antipsychotic and an antidepressant). As concomitant therapy in both groups the use of biperiden or lorazepam was possible if necessary. All daily antipsychotic and antidepressant doses were converted to defined daily dose equivalents (DDD), as defined by the World Health Organization, and the current daily dose was categorized into less than one DDD equivalent and one or more DDD equivalents [27].

All patients had normal liver and renal functions according to normal values of transaminases, blood urea nitrogen and creatinine. The serum levels of potassium, sodium and calcium ions were determined. Body weight and height were measured and body mass index (BMI) was calculated. ECG was performed by routine clinically used 12-lead electrocardiogram apparatus which automatically calculates the QTc interval. We are aware that the method used is a limitation of this study because the measurement by the cardiologist could have been more accurate [28]. The length of QT interval was compared before and after treatment in the same group and between the groups; differences were statistically analysed. The statistical analysis was done using SPSS program 12.0 and included independent and dependent t test and Fisher's exact test.

Results and discussion

Characteristics of patients and applied therapy

Sixty one patients were included in the study. Thirty two women were receiving an antipsychotic or an antidepressant (group 1) and twenty nine women were treated with an antipsychotic in combination with an antidepressant. The two groups did not differ significantly with respect to age, duration of illness, BMI, smoking status and doses of psychopharmacs converted to DDD equivalents (Table 1). In twenty patients (33%) doses of applied psychotropic drugs were above DDD while forty one patients (67%) had equal or smaller doses in comparison to DDD. Table 2 show the frequency of applied antipsychotics and antidepressants respectively in the both groups.
Table 1

Characteristics of patients

 

Group 1 (N = 32)

Group 2 (N = 29)

 

Characteristic

Patients in monotherapy

Patients in polytherapy

*p

Age, range (yr)

27–69

27–70

 

Age, mean ± SD (yr)

48.3 ± 8.8

48.6 ± 11.3

0.771

Duration of illness, mean ± SD (yr)

10.8 ± 7.3

10.7 ± 9.1

0.950

BMI, mean ± SD

25.1 ± 5.5

27.9 ± 5.5

0.059

   

**p

Smoking present, N (%)

16 (50.0)

15 (51.7)

1.000

Applied dose > DDD:

   

   Dose of AP > DDD, N (%)

7 (21.9)

8 (27.6)

0.767

   Dose of AD > DDD, N (%)

9 (28.1)

11 (37.9)

0.586

*p – 2-tailed t test; **p – 2-tailed Fisher Exact test; BMI – "body mass index";

DDD – "defined daily dose"; AP – antipsychotic; AD – antidepressant

Table 2

Characteristics of applied therapy

 

Group 1 (N = 32)

Group 2 (N = 29)

Psychotropic drug

Patients in monotherapy

Patients in polytherapy

 

N of patients

dose range (mg/d)

N of patients

dose range(mg/d)

 
     

AD used

Antipsychotic

     

   Ziprasidone

3

120–160

1

120

map

   Olanzapine

4

10–20

7

5–15

Mir,ven,par,fluo

   Clozapine

1

100

-

-

-

   Risperidone

3

3–5

1

4

map

   Sulpiride

1

400

3

50–200

ser,clo

   fluophenazine

7

5–8

6

2–15

tia,ser,par,map

   Haloperidol

3

6–15

4

4–15

mir,map,esc,clo

   Promazine

-

-

4

75–350

tia,ven,map

   Quetiapine

-

-

2

300–500

par,fluo

   zuclopenthixol

-

-

1

10

Fluo

     

AP used

Antidepressant

     

   Mirtazapine

2

30

3

15–30

ol,hal

   Fluvoxamine

1

150

-

-

-

   Tianeptin

2

37.5

2

37.5

flu,pro,

   Sertraline

2

50–100

2

50

sul,flu

   Venlafaxine

2

37.5–75

4

37.5–150

ol,pro

   Paroxetine

-

-

4

10–40

Ol,flu,que

   Maprotiline

1

100

7

50–100

zip,ris,flu,hal

   Fluoxetine

-

-

3

20–40

ol,que,zuc

   escitalopram

-

-

1

15

Hal

   clomipramine

-

-

3

25

sul,hal

AD – antidepressant: map-maprotiline, mir-mirtazapine, ven-venlafaxine, par-paroxetine, fluo-fluoxetine, ser-sertraline, clo-clomipramine, tia-tianeptin, esc-escitalopram

AP -antipsychotic: ol-olanzapine, hal-haloperidol, flu-fluophenazine, pro-promazine, sul-sulpiride, que-quetiapine, zip-ziprasidone, ris-risperidone, zuc-zuclopenthixol

QTc interval

Mean baseline values of QTc in group 1 (439 ± 22 ms) and group 2 (439 ± 22 ms) were similar (independent t test p = 0,953) (Table 3). There were no significant differences in the length of QTc between the groups after two weeks of treatment also: the mean values were 439 ± 24 ms in the group 1 and 440 ± 20 ms in the group 2 (independent t test p = 0,878 (Table 3). In group 1 the length of QTc before and after treatment was similar (dependent t test p = 0.989); the same was observed in group 2 (dependent t test p = 0.812). The two groups did not differ significantly in the number of patients with QTc > 470 ms, not before therapy (Fisher's exact test p = 0.600) neither after two weeks of treatment (Fisher's exact test p = 0.674). There were three women (9.4%) in the group 1 with the QTc prolongation more than 30 ms from the baseline value (prolongations were 30, 32, and 87 ms) and the same number was found in the group 2 (10.3%), (prolongations were 44, 66, and 66 ms). Mean values of QTc prolongation in the group 1 and group 2 were 8 ± 17 ms and 9 ± 19 ms respectively (independent t test p = 0.840).
Table 3

Characteristics of QTc interval

 

Group 1 (N = 32)

Group 2 (N = 29)

 

Characteristic

Patients in monotherapy

Patients in polytherapy

*p

QTc I, mean ± SD (ms)

439 ± 22

439 ± 22

0.953

QTc II, mean ± SD (ms)

439 ± 24

440 ± 20

0.878

***p

0.989

0.812

 

QTc prolongation, mean ± SD (ms)

8 ± 17

9 ± 19

0.840

   

**p

QTc I > 450 ms, N (%)

12 (37.5)

10 (34.5)

1.000

QTc II > 450 ms, N (%)

10 (31.3)

9 (31.0)

1.000

QTc I 451–470 ms, N (%)

11 (34.4)

8 (27.6)

0.593

QTc II 451–470 ms, N (%)

6 (18.7)

7 (24.1)

0.757

QTc I > 470 ms, N (%)

1 (3.1)

2 (6.9)

0.600

QTc II > 470 ms, N (%)

4 (12.5)

2 (6.9)

0.674

QTc II – QTc I > 30 ms, N (%)

3 (9.4)

3 (10.3)

1.000

*p – 2-tailed unpaired t test; **p – 2-tailed Fisher Exact test; ***p – 2-tailed paired t test; QTc I – baseline QTc; QTc II – QTc after two weeks of treatment

Our study did not reveal significant differences in the mean QTc length between women treated with antipsychotics or antidepressants and women who were treated with both of these drugs. There was no significant QT prolongation after two weeks of treatment in the both groups too. No one patient had QTc = 500 ms. Eight patients of sixty one patients included in the study (13%) had QTc intervals > 470 ms and/or the QTc prolongation of 30 ms or more from the baseline value. Five of these eight patients were from the monotherapy group: three women who were taking fluphenazine (7.5 mg/d), venlafaxine (37.5 mg/d) or mirtazapine (30 mg/d) had hypocalcaemia, one woman was on ziprasidone (160 mg/d) and the last one (on fluphenazine 7.5 mg/d) had borderline QTc before starting treatment. The rest three patients were in the polytherapy group: one woman was treated with promazine (200 mg/d) and maprotiline (100 mg/d) and had positive family history of sudden father's death; one patient was on high antidepressant therapy: paroxetine (40 mg/d) in combination with mirtazapine (30 mg/d) and olanzapine (5 mg/d); the third one was treated with promazine (75 mg/d) and venlafaxine (75 mg/d). All of these eight patients had normal potassium and sodium serum levels.

One potential explanation why we did not observe significant QT prolongation in women on combined psychotropic therapy could be the dose of psychopharmacs applied. In two third of included patients doses of antipsychotics and antidepressants were equal or below DDD, in the group 1 and 2. The quantity of drug given to patient was determined by psychiatrist who cured the patient and was clinically determined. Further more, some authors point out that DDD equivalents are smaller than chlorpromazine or haloperidol equivalents used in some previous studies [29]. The other explanation could be the relatively small number of encompassed patients.

Hennessy and al. [4] found that treated schizophrenic patients have longer QTc intervals and higher rates of cardiac arrhythmias than control subjects but they could not determine whether that finding was connected with schizophrenia or its treatment. We found in our study that a great proportion of included patients (more than one third) exceeded the threshold of borderline QTc values (> 450 ms) prior to treatment, and the mean duration of psychiatric illness was more than 10 years. Possible explanation for this finding could be that patients with schizophrenia are at higher risk for other illnesses (e.g. atherosclerosis and cardiac abnormalities) than people in the general population [30, 31].

Conclusion

We did not find significant differences in QTc length after two weeks of treatment between patients treated with antipsychotics or antidepressants and those treated with combinations of these drugs. No one patient had QTc interval equal or longer than 500 ms, not before therapy neither after two weeks of therapy, but more than one third of included women had borderline QTc values before starting therapy. Our results encourage us in our clinical work but not in manner to be less cautious when prescribing psychopharmacs, especially in patients with renal, hepatic, cardiovascular or other health problems.

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgements

No acknowledgements.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Vrapče Psychiatric Hospital

References

  1. Straus SMJM, Sturkenboom MCJM, Bleumink GS, Dieleman JP, van der Lei J, de Graeff PA, Kingma JH, Stricker BHCh: Non-cardiac QTc-prolonging drugs and the risk of sudden cardiac death. European HeartJournal. 2005, 26: 2007-2012. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi312.View Article
  2. Straus SMJM, Bleumink GS, Dieleman JP, van der Lei J, 't Jong GE, Kingma JH, Sturkenboom MCJM, Stricker BHCh: Antipsychotic and the risk of sudden cardiac death. Arch Intern Med. 2004, 164: 1293-1297. 10.1001/archinte.164.12.1293.View ArticlePubMed
  3. Gardner DM, Baldessarini RJ, Waraich P: Modern antipsychotic drugs: A critical overview. CMAJ. 2005, 172: 1703-1711.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  4. Hennessy S, Bilker WB, Knauss JS, Margolis DJ, Kimmel SE, Reynolds RF, Glasser DB, Morrison MF, Strom BL: Cardiac arrest and ventricular arrhythmia in patients taking antipsychotic drugs: cohort study using administrative data. BMJ. 2002, 325: 1070-1074. 10.1136/bmj.325.7372.1070.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  5. Fayek M, Kingsbury SJ, Zada J, Simpson GM: Cardiac effects of antipsychotic medications. Psychiatr Serv. 2001, 52: 607-609. 10.1176/appi.ps.52.5.607.View ArticlePubMed
  6. Vieweg WVR, Wood MA: Tricyclic antidepressants, QT interval prolongation and torsade de pointes. Psychosomatics. 2004, 45: 371-377. 10.1176/appi.psy.45.5.371.View ArticlePubMed
  7. Glassman AH, Bigger JT: Antipsychotic drugs: prolonged QTc interval, torsade de pointes, and sudden death. Am J Psychiatry. 2001, 158: 1774-1782. 10.1176/appi.ajp.158.11.1774.View ArticlePubMed
  8. Drew BJ, Califf RM, Funk M, Kaufman ES, Krucoff MV, Laks MM, Macfarlane PV, Sommargren C, Swiryn S, Van Hare GF: Practice standards for electrocardiographic monitoring in hospital settings. Circulation. 2004, 110: 2721-2746. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000145144.56673.59.View ArticlePubMed
  9. Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use: The Clinical Evaluation of QT/QTc Interval Prolongation and Proarrhythmic Potential for Non-Antiarrhythmic Drugs. 2004, [http://www.emea.eu.int/pdfs/human/ich/000204en.pdf]
  10. Cheng J: Evidences of the gender-related differences in cardiac repolarization and the underlying mechanisms in different animal species and human. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2006, 20: 1-8. 10.1111/j.1472-8206.2005.00384.x.View ArticlePubMed
  11. Pham TV, Rosen MR: Sex, hormones, and repolarization. Cardiovasc Res. 2002, 53: 740-751. 10.1016/S0008-6363(01)00429-1.View ArticlePubMed
  12. Drici M-D: Influence of gender on drug-acquired long QT syndrome. Eur Heart J Supplements. 2001, 3 (Suppl K): K41-K47. 10.1016/S1520-765X(01)90005-7.View Article
  13. Ito H, Kono T, Ishida S, Maeda H: Gender difference in QTc prolongation of people with mental disorders. Ann Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2004, 3: 3-10.1186/1475-2832-3-3.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  14. Van Mieghem C, Sabbe M, Knockaert D: The clinical value of the ECG in noncardiac conditions. CHEST. 2004, 125: 1561-1576. 10.1378/chest.125.4.1561.View ArticlePubMed
  15. Llerena A, Berecz R, Dorado P, De la Rubia A: QTc interval, CYP2D6 and CYP2C9 genotypes and risperidone plasma concentrations. J Psychopharmacol. 2004, 18: 189-193. 10.1177/0269881104042618.View ArticlePubMed
  16. O'Brien P, Oyebode F: Psychotropic medication and the heart. Adv Psychiatr Treat. 2003, 9: 414-423. 10.1192/apt.9.6.414.View Article
  17. Moss AJ: Long QT syndrome. JAMA. 2003, 289: 2041-2044. 10.1001/jama.289.16.2041.View ArticlePubMed
  18. Kass RS, Moss AJ: Long QT syndrome: novel insights into the mechanisms of cardiac arrhythmias. J Clin Invest. 2003, 112: 810-815. 10.1172/JCI200319844.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  19. Moss AJ, Kass RS: Long QT syndrome: from channels to cardiac arrhythmias. J Clin Invest. 2005, 115: 2018-2024. 10.1172/JCI25537.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  20. Clancy cE, Kass RS: Inherited and acquired vulnerability to ventricular arrhythmias: cardiac Na+ and K+ channels. Physiol Rev. 2005, 85: 33-47. 10.1152/physrev.00005.2004.View ArticlePubMed
  21. Priori SG: Inherited Arrhythmogenic Disease: The complexity beyond monogenic disorders (reviews). Circ Res. 2004, 94: 140-145. 10.1161/01.RES.0000115750.12807.7E.View ArticlePubMed
  22. Roden DM, Viswanathan PC: Genetics of acquired long QT syndrome. J Clin Invest. 2005, 115: 2025-2032. 10.1172/JCI25539.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  23. Yang P, Kanki H, Drolet B, Yang T, Wei J, Viswanathan PC, Hohnloser SH, Shimizu W, Schwartz PJ, Stanton M, Murray KT, Norris K, George AL, Roden DM: Allelic variants in long-QT disease genes in patients with drug-associated torsades de pointes. Circulation. 2002, 105: 1943-1948. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000014448.19052.4C.View ArticlePubMed
  24. Mitcheson JS, Chen J, Lin M, Culberson C, Sanguinetti MC: A structural basis for drug-induced long QT syndrome. PNAS. 2000, 97: 12329-12333. 10.1073/pnas.210244497.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  25. Arizona CERT: Drug List by Risk Groups. [http://www.arizonacert.org/medical-pros/drug-lists/drug-lists.htm]
  26. Sala M, Vicentini A, Brambilla P, Montomoli C, Jogia JRS, Caverzasi E, Bonzano A, Piccinelli M, Barale F, de Ferrari GM: QT interval prolongation related to psychoactive drug treatment: a comparison of monotherapy versus polytherapy. Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2005, 4: 1-10.1186/1744-859X-4-1.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  27. WHO: Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology; ATC Index with DDDs 2006. 2005, [http://www.whocc.no/atcddd/]
  28. Al-Khatib SM, Allen LaPointe NM, Kramer JM, Califf RM: What clinicians should know about the QT interval. JAMA. 2003, 289: 2120-2127. 10.1001/jama.289.16.2120.View ArticlePubMed
  29. Rijcken CAW, Monster TBM, Brouwers JRBJ, de Jong-van den Berg LTW: Chlorpromazine equivalents versus defined daily doses: how to compare antipsychotic drug dosed?. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2003, 23: 657-659. 10.1097/01.jcp.0000096247.29231.3a.View ArticlePubMed
  30. Haverkamp W, Breithardt G: Drug-induced sudden cardiac death. Eur Heart J. 2005, 26: 1808-1809. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi401.View ArticlePubMed
  31. Shah SU, Iqbal Z, White A, White S: Heart and mind: psychotropic and cardiovascular therapeutics. Postgrad Med J. 2005, 81: 33-40. 10.1136/pgmj.2003.015230.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed

Copyright

© Sumić et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement