Skip to main content

Table 2 The effects of gender and other related factors on QTc interval.

From: Gender difference in QTc prolongation of people with mental disorders

Factor other than gender

Term in the statistical model

Mean (SD) of QTc interval

F-value

diagnosis

gender

 

8.559**

 

diagnosis

 

1.870

 

   others (n = 139)

0.402 (0.040)

 
 

   schizophrenia (n = 94)

0.407 (0.033)

 
 

   mood disorders (n = 95)

0.415 (0.032)

 
 

gender • diagnosis

 

0.253

antipsychotics

gender

 

7.952**

 

antipsychotics

 

1.035

 

   0 mg (n = 96)

0.406 (0.036)

 
 

   0–100 mg (n = 66)

0.405 (0.031)

 
 

   100–500 mg (n = 103)

0.410 (0.039)

 
 

   500 mg + (n = 63)

0.409 (0.035)

 
 

gender • antipsychotics

 

1.526

antidepressants

gender

 

1.359

 

antidepressants

 

1.036

 

   0 mg (n = 238)

0.405 (0.038)

 
 

   0–50 mg (n = 26)

0.416 (0.030)

 
 

   50–100 mg (n = 39)

0.413 (0.031)

 
 

   100 mg + (n = 25)

0.417 (0.026)

 
 

gender • antidepressants

 

1.752

cardiovascular disease

gender

 

1.114

 

cardiovascular disease

 

5.483*

 

   absent (n = 277)

0.405 (0.036)1)

 
 

   present (n = 51)

0.420 (0.035)1)

 
 

gender • cardiovascular disease

 

2.180

cerebrovascular disease

gender

 

2.048

 

cerebrovascular disease

 

0.014

 

   absent (n = 318)

0.407 (0.036)

 
 

   present (n = 10)

0.414 (0.029)

 
 

gender • cerebrovascular disease

 

0.267

hepatic failure

gender

 

4.694*

 

hepatic failure

 

0.024

 

   absent (n = 258)

0.408 (0.037)

 
 

   present (n = 70)

0.407 (0.034)

 
 

gender • hepatic failure

 

0.062

diabetes

gender

 

0.065

 

diabetes

 

0.103

 

   absent (n = 303)

0.408 (0.033)

 
 

   present (n = 25)

0.408 (0.063)

 
 

gender • diabetes

 

2.125

  1. Two-way ANCOVA (analysis of covariance): Gender and each of the 7 variables in the most left column were included as two factors, QTc interval as a dependent variable, and age at admission as a covariate. 7 tests were performed in total. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. 1) As this variable has only two categories, it is manifest without post-hoc analysis that there is a significant difference between these values.