Parameter | Information |
---|---|
Study | Greenhill et al., 2002 [33] |
Type | Community setting. Multicentre, placebo-controlled, USA. |
Population characteristics | 6-16 years old, mild ADHD |
Interventions | Placebo (163), MPH-MR 30:70 (158) |
Dose and duration | 20-60 mg/day, titrated to optimum efficacy (3 weeks) |
Outcome measures | Teacher and Parent Conners' Global Index, CGI-S, CGI-I |
Conclusions | Equasym XL administered once daily in the morning was well tolerated and significantly more effective than placebo in controlling ADHD symptoms throughout the school day. Symptom control was achieved in the morning and afternoon. |
Study | Findling et al., 2006 [19] |
Type | Community setting. Non-inferiority, Australia, Canada and USA. |
Population characteristics | 6-12 years old, ADHD |
Interventions | Placebo, Ritalin (IR), MPH-MR 30:70 |
Dose and duration | According to prestudy MPH regimen. Equasym XL, 20-60 mg/day; Ritalin, 10-30 mg twice daily (3 weeks). |
Outcome measures | Teacher's and parent's IOWA Conners' Rating Scale |
Conclusions | Equasym XL once daily was statistically non-inferior to Ritalin twice daily in the treatment of school-age children with methylphenidate-responsive ADHD. Both Equasym XL and Ritalin were superior to placebo in controlling ADHD symptoms, and were well tolerated. |
Study | Swanson et al., 2004 [23] |
Type | Laboratory-classroom setting. Double-blind, three-way, crossover study, USA. |
Population characteristics | 6-12 years old, confirmed ADHD |
Interventions | MPH-MR 30:70, Concerta XL |
Dose and duration | Assigned to low (20 or 18 mg/day), medium (40 or 36 mg/day) or high (60 or 54 mg/day) dose according to prestudy MPH dose. Crossover design, so all patients received both active agents and placebo for 7 days each throughout a 3-week period. |
Outcome measures | SKAMP Rating Scale, PERMP |
Conclusions | There were statistically significant differences between the efficacy of Equasym XL and Concerta in children with ADHD in the laboratory school setting. As predicted by the PK/PD model, clinical superiority at any time point was achieved by the formulation with the highest expected plasma methylphenidate concentration. |