From: No role for initial severity on the efficacy of antidepressants: results of a multi-meta-analysis
Analyses | Effect size (CI/CrI) | Heterogeneity (CrI) | Role for initial severity | Respects randomisation | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 | RMD | SMD | RMD | SMD | RMD | SMD |  |
Frequentist methods | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
 Simple random effects meta-analysis | 2.71 (1.96, 3.45) | 0.33 (0.24, 0.42) | 2.50 | 0.03 |  |  | Yes |
 NMA random effects analysis |  |  | 2.31 | 0.03 |  |  | Yes |
 Meta-regression random effects analysis |  |  | 1.57 | 0.02 | Yes | Yes | Yes |
 Turner et al. (random effects meta-analysis) | - | 0.31 (0.27, 0.35) | - | - | - | - | Yes |
 Khan et al., ratio of the number of early discontinued patients divided by the total number of patients in each group (chi-square is also calculated) | - | - | - | - | Yes | Yes | No |
 Kirsch et al. (weight by sample size/SD2) | 1.80 | 0.32 | - | - | - | Yes | No |
 Horder et al. (random effects meta-analysis) | 2.70 (1.95, 3.44) | - | - | - | Yes | - | Meta-analysis: yes |
Meta-regression: no | |||||||
 Fountoulakis et al. (sample size weighting) | 2.18 | 0.32 | - | - | - | - | No |
 Fountoulakis et al. (inverse variance weighting) | 2.68 | 0.35 | - | - | - | - | No |
Bayesian methods | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
 Simple random effects meta-analysis | 2.61 (1.94, 3.30) | 0.32 (0.25, 0.40) | 1.61 (0.53, 3.53) | 0.02 (0.00, 0.05) |  |  | Yes |
 NMA random effects analysis |  |  | 0.71 (0.24, 0.98) | 0.01 (0.00, 0.05) |  |  | Yes |
 Simple random effects meta-regression analysis | 2.77 (2.18, 3.36) | 0.34 (0.27, 0.42) | 0.58 (0.00, 2.13) | 0.01 (0.00, 0.05) | Yes | No | Yes |
 Simple random effects meta-regression analysis using 12 different priors |  |  |  |  | Yes | No | Yes |
 NMA random effects meta-regression analysis |  |  | 0.59 (0.01, 2.19) | 0.01 (0.00, 0.05) | Yes | No | Yes |
 NMA random effects meta-regression using 12 different priors |  |  |  |  | Yes | No | Yes |