Skip to main content

Table 1 Overview of five acute bipolar depression studies of quetiapine IR and XR

From: Bipolar II compared with bipolar I disorder: baseline characteristics and treatment response to quetiapine in a pooled analysis of five placebo-controlled clinical trials of acute bipolar depression

Study name (Trial ID number/

NCT number)

Patient population

Design

Treatments

Efficacy measures

Quetiapine IR

 BOLDER I (5077US/0049/NCT00060489)a

 BOLDER II (D1447C00135/NCT00083954)b

N = 542 (BOLDER I)

N = 509 (BOLDER II)

8-week

Double-blind, fixed-dose, parallel-group

Identical study design to EMBOLDEN I and II

Quetiapine 300 mg/day or 600 mg/day

Placebo

MADRS (primary)

HAM-D

CGI-S

CGI-C

PSQI (BOLDER I)

SDS (BOLDER II)

Q-LES-Q

 EMBOLDEN I (D1447C00001)c

 EMBOLDEN II (D1447C00134/NCT00119652)d

N = 802 (EMBOLDEN I)

N = 740 (EMBOLDEN II)

8-week (acute phase)

Double-blind, fixed-dose, parallel-group

Identical study design to BOLDER I and II

Quetiapine 300 mg/day or 600 mg/day

Lithium 600–1800 mg/day (EMBOLDEN I)

Paroxetine 20 mg/day (EMBOLDEN II)

Placebo

MADRS (primary)

HAM-D

CGI-BP-S

CGI-BP-C

HAM-A

SDS

Q-LES-Q (EMBOLDEN II)

MOS-Cog (EMBOLDEN I)

Quetiapine XR

 002 XR (D144CC00002/NCT00422214)e

N = 280

8-week (acute phase)

Double-blind, parallel-group

Quetiapine XR 300 mg/day

Placebo

MADRS (primary)

CGI-BP-C

CGI-BP-S

  1. CGI-(BP)-S clinical global impression-(bipolar)-severity, CGI-(BP)-C clinical global impression-bipolar-change, HAM-D Hamilton depression rating scale, HAM-A Hamilton rating scale for anxiety, MADRS Montgomery–Åsberg depression rating scale, MOS-Cog Medical Outcomes Study Cognitive Scale, PSQI Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, Q-LES-Q Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire, SDS Sheehan Disability Scale
  2. aCalabrese et al. [21]
  3. bThase et al. [23]
  4. cYoung et al. [24]
  5. dMcElroy et al. [22]
  6. eSuppes et al. [25]