Skip to main content

Table 4 Measurement invariance testing results of the PANSI-C across different groups

From: The factor structure and psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Positive and Negative Suicide Ideation Inventory (PANSI-C) in a non-clinical sample of Chinese adolescents

Model

χ2

df

TLI

CFI

SRMR

RMSEA

∆TLI

∆CFI

∆RMSEA

Across gender

 Model 1

823.480

152

.913

.927

.051

.059

–

–

–

 Model 2

841.111

164

.918

.926

.056

.057

+ .005

− .001

− .002

 Model 3

867.567

176

.919

.921

.058

.057

+ .001

− .005

0

 Model 4

899.094

190

.929

.926

.058

.053

+ .01

+ .005

− .004

Across family structure

 Model 1

805.982

152

.910

.925

.051

.062

–

–

–

 Model 2

828.913

164

.915

.924

.057

.060

+ .005

− .001

− .002

 Model 3

844.225

176

.918

.921

.057

.059

+ .003

− .003

− .001

 Model 4

887.175

190

.926

.923

.058

.056

+ .008

+ .002

− .003

Across age

 Model 1

875.323

152

.904

.919

.053

.061

–

–

–

 Model 2

909.603

164

.907

.916

.061

.060

+ .003

− .003

− .001

 Model 3

924.590

176

.910

.913

.062

.059

+ .003

− .003

− .001

 Model 4

947.191

190

.922

.918

.062

.055

+ .012

+ .005

− .004

  1. Model 1, configural invariance; Model 2, weak invariance; Model 3, strong invariance; Model 4, strict invariance; χ2, Chi-square goodness of fit; df, degrees of freedom; TLI, Tucker–Lewis index; CFI, comparative fit index; SRMR, standardized root mean square residual; RMSEA, root mean square error of approximation; ∆TLI, TLI difference; ∆CFI, CFI difference; ∆RMSEA, RMSEA difference