Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of study participants among the elderly populations

From: Prevalence and determinants of depression among old age: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author, year of publication

Country

Study design

Sample size

Tools with cut off points

Sampling technique

Response rate

Characteristics of respondents

Overall prevalence (%)

Boman et al. 2015

Anland, Finnish

CS

1452

GDS-15 ≥ 5

NR

93.5%

F ≥ 65 years

11.2

Güzel et al. 2020

Burdur, Turkey

CS

770

GDS-30 ≥ 14

Cluster sampling method

NR

M & F

 ≥ 65 years

51.8

Swarnalatha N et al. 2013

Chittoor District, India

CS

400

GDS-15 > 5

Random sampling

100%

M & F

 ≥ 60 years

47

Ashe et al. 2019

Cuttack district, India

CS

354

GDS-30 ≥ 10

Simple random sampling

97.5%

M & F

 > 60 years

81.1

Girma et al. 2016

Harar, Ethiopia

CS

344

GDS-15 ≥ 5

Systematic random sampling technique

97.7%

M & F

 > 60 years

28.5

Mirkena et al. 2018

Ambo, Ethiopia

CS

800

GDS-15 ≥ 5

Multi-stage sampling technique

94.8%

M & F

 ≥ 60 years

41.8

He et al. 2016

Rural China

CS

509

GDS-30 ≥ 11

NR

96.8%

M & F

 > 65 years

36.94

Cong et al. 2015

Fuzhou, China

CS

1910

GDS-30 ≥ 11

Randomly selected

98.0%

M & F

 > 60 years

10.5

Feng et al. 2014

Xinjiang, China

CS

1329

GMS ≥ 3

Multistage stratified random sampling

91.3%

M & F

 > 60 years

10.61

Kugbey et al. 2018

Ghana

CS

262

GDS-15 ≥ 5

Stratified random sampling

100%

M & F

 > 65 years

37.8

Rajkumar et al. 2009

Southern Indian, Tamil Nadu

CS

978

ICD-10

NR

97.75%

M & F

 > 65 years

12.7

Choulagai P S et al. 2013

Kathmandu Valley, Nepal

CS

78

GDS-30 ≥ 10

Purposively selected

100%

M & F

 > 60 years

51.3

Simkhada et al. 2017

Kathmandu, Nepal

CS

300

GDS-15 ≥ 5

Randomly selected

99.0%

M & F

 > 60 years

60.6

Manandhar et al. 2019

Kavre district, Nepal

CS

439

GDS-15 ≥ 6

Randomly selected

95.4%

M & F

 ≥ 60 years

53.1

Arslantas et al. 2014

Middle Anatolia, Turkey

CS

203

GDS-30 ≥ 13

NR

80.8%

M & F

 ≥ 65 years

45.8

Yaka et al. 2014

Turkey

CS

482

GDS-15 ≥ 8

Cluster sampling method

100%

M & F

 ≥ 65 years

18.5

Charoensakulchai et al. 2019

Thailand

CS

416

GDS-30 ≥ 13

NR

100%

M & F

 > 60 years

18.5

Forlani et al. 2012

Bologna, Italy

CS

359

ICD-10

Randomly chosen sample

100%

M & F

 > 74 years

25.1

Wilson et al. 2007

UK

Cohort

376

GDS-15 ≥ 5

NR

100%

M & F

80 to 90 years

21

Steffens et al. 2009

USA

Cohort

775

CIDI-SF ≥ 5

Stratified sampling method

90.5%

M & F

 > 71 years

11.19

Manaf et al. 2016

Perak, Malaysia

CS

230

DASS-21 ≥ 5

Convenient sampling

100%

M & F

 > 60 years

27.8

Almeida et al. 2014

Kimberley

and Derby, Australia

CS

235

KICA-dep ≥ 9

NR

94.0%

M & F

 > 45 years

7.7

Weyerer et al. 2008

German

CS

3242

GDS-15 ≥ 6

NR

100%

M & F

 > 75 years

9.7

Jadav et al. 2017

Vadodara, Gujarat, India

CS

176

GDS-15 > 5

Simple random sampling

88%

M & F

 > 60 years

34.1

Sinha et al. 2013

Tamil Nadu, India

CS

103

GDS-15 ≥ 5

Universal sampling technique

100%

M & F

 ≥ 60 years

42.7

Kaji et al. 2010

Japan

CS

10,969

CES-D ≥ 16

Stratified sampling design

100%

M & F

 > 50 years

31.2

Ferna´ndez et al. 2014

Mexico

CS

7867

CES-D ≥ 5

NR

NR

M & F

 > 60 years

35.6

AL-shammari et al. 1999

Saudi Arabia

CS

7970

GDS-30 ≥ 10

Stratified two-stage sampling technique

98.8%

M & F

 > 60 years

39

Sidik et al. 2004

Sepang, Malaysia

CS

223

GDS-30 > 10

Simple random sampling

84.8%

M & F

 > 60 years

7.6

Subramaniam et al. 2016

Singapore

CS

2565

GMS ≥ 1

Stratified sampling design

NR

M & F

 > 60 years

17.1

Assil et al. 2013

Sudan

CS

300

GDS-15 ≥ 5

Systematic

random sampling

100%

M & F

 > 60 years

41.0

Haseen et al. 2011

Rural, Thailand

CS

1001

Euro-D scale-12 ≥ 5

NR

100%

M & F

 > 60 years

27.5

Ghubash et al. 2004

United Arab Emirates

CS

610

GMS-A3 ≥ 3

Selected by randomly

90.3%

M & F

 > 60 years

20.2

Abdo et al. 2011

Zagazig District, Egypt

CS

290

GDS-30 ≥ 10

Multistage random sampling technique

100%

M & F

 > 60 years

46. 6

Snowdon et al. 1994

Sydney, Australia

Cohort

146

DSM-III

Random sample

69%

M & F

 > 65 years

12.5

McCall et al. 2002

USA

CS

617

MCS ≥ 42

Simple random sampling

61.7%

M & F

 > 65 years

25

Li et al. 2016

China, CDEP

CS

4901

GDS-30 ≥ 11

Consecutively selected

NR

M & F

 > 60 years

11.6

Mendes et al. 2008

Brazil, Inpatients

CS

189

GDS-15 > 6

Randomly selected

100%

M & F

 > 60 years

56.1

Li et al. 2016

China, EMI

CS

2373

GDS-30 ≥ 11

Consecutively selected

NR

M & F

 > 60 years

18.1

Prashanth et al. 2015

India, Outpatient

Cohort

51

GDS-15 ≥ 5

NR

100%

M & F

 > 60 years

58.8

Helvik et al. 2010

Norway, Medical inpatients

CS

484

HADS ≥ 8

NR

100%

M & F

 > 65 years

10.3

Anantapong et al. 2017

Thailand, Outpatients

CS

408

GDS-15 > 5

Convenience sampling

100%

65–99 years

9.6

  1. CDEP: community-dwelling elderly people; CES-D: Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale; CIDI-SF: Composite International Diagnostic Interview Short Form; CS: cross-sectional; DASS-21: Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale; DSM-III: diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; EMI: elderly medical inpatients; GDS: Geriatric Depression Scale; GMS: Geriatric Mental State Schedule; HADS: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; KICA-dep: Kimberley Indigenous Cognitive Assessment of Depression; MCS: mental component summary; NR: not reported; UK: United Kingdom; USA: United States of America