Skip to content


  • Poster presentation
  • Open Access

Signal processing of the galvanic skin response to quantitatively assess aspects of the educational process

  • 1 and
  • 1
Annals of General Psychiatry20087 (Suppl 1) :S233

  • Published:


  • Time Series
  • Signal Processing
  • Emotional Experience
  • Cognitive Activity
  • Educational Process


Galvanic skin response has a long history and is regularly employed to objectively assess along with other psycho-physiological responses the state of arousal, emotions and as well as cognitive activity [1]. It is a relatively simple and not invasive method and can be applied with little disturbance to subjects. With the advent of electronics it is possible to continuously measure the galvanic skin response, store it in a computer and apply signal processing to extract valuable information [2],[3]. At the same time the computer can be utilized to deliver the stimuli to the subjects thus allowing flexibility, uniformity, a variety of stimuli and combinations of them. In education most of the research is done using subjective tools and many times not concurrently, to assess the various pertinent aspects, like interest, attention, etc. The aim of the present work is to utilize the galvanic skin response of students both at high school and at the university using various stimuli related to the education processes, do signal processing to the resulted time series and device indicators that will describe the objective response of the students.

Materials and methods

To achieve this we have setup a series of stimuli, optical, auditorial and combinations related to situations in the classroom, recorded the response from a number of students by delivering the stimuli through a computer, and processed the signal. From the processing the characteristics of the signal have been isolated and a set of indicators to quantify them has been introduced [4].


This research project will conclude in two steps. Here we present results from the first step which comprise of the experimentation on a small number of subjects to determine a set of stimuli appropriate for the educational case, the study of the time series and the device of quantitative indicators. We find that it is possible to find a suitable set of stimuli to access the educational process. The time series in general comprises of pink noise and the response to the delivered stimuli, thus one can perform a deconvolution to obtain the response. We have tried various quantitative measures of the response and found an indicator which describes a major part of the response. According to this indicator all subjects of this phase showed a clear tendency to habituation.


Our results suggest that there is great potential for using physiological metrics to model emotional experience and cognitive activity, specifically to access the educational process. Experimenting on a small number of subjects we have produced a package of stimuli, signal processing method to isolate the response to stimuli and an appropriate quantitative indicator. The next step is to apply the method to the actual training of pre-service physics teachers.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Physics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece


  1. Kim K. H., Bang S. W., Kim S. R.: Emotion recognition system using short-term monitoring of physiological signals, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing. 2004, 42: 419-427.Google Scholar
  2. Wagner J., Kim J., Andre E.: From Physiological Signals to Emotions: Implementing and Comparing Selected Methods for Feature Extraction and Classification. IEEE International Conference on Multimedia & Expo (ICME 2005). 2005Google Scholar
  3. Donadio V., Karlsson T., Elam M., Wallin B. G.: Interindividual differences in sympathetic and effector responses to arousal in humans Journal of Physiology. 2002, 544 (1): 293-302.Google Scholar
  4. Mandryk R.L., Inkpen K.: Physiological Indicators for the Evaluation of Co-located Collaborative Play. Proceedings of Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW 2004). Chicago, IL, USAGoogle Scholar


© Pierratos and Polatoglou; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd.