Skip to content


  • Meeting abstract
  • Open Access

What makes good guidelines?

  • 1
Annals of General Psychiatry20109 (Suppl 1) :S52

  • Published:


  • Public Health
  • Health Care
  • Schizophrenia
  • Health Outcome
  • Empirical Study

In the last two decades, a large number of national and international treatment guidelines have been developed, to assist practioners in making decisions based on available evidence. However, according to a survey of schizophrenia practice guidelines for example [1], the methodological quality of the most guidelines was at best moderate. Hence, national and international institutions attempted great efforts to enhance guideline quality by describing and establishing characteristics for structure and process of their development. Beyond that, a 'good' guideline is expected to be effective, and thus to enhance outcome. Accordingly, an overview regarding methodological criteria for guideline development will be given. In addition, the results of empirical studies focusing the impact of treatment guidelines on health outcome will be summarized. As to the conclusions, developing guidelines based on highest methodological criteria is mandatory, however expectations regarding enhanced outcome in health care should be scaled down.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Germany


  1. Gaebel, et al: Schizophrenia practice guidelines: international survey and comparison. BJP. 2005, 248-55. 10.1192/bjp.187.3.248.Google Scholar


© Gaebel; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd.