Open Access

The characteristics of the suicide attempter according to the onset time of the suicidal ideation

  • Kotaro Otsuka1, 2Email author,
  • Hikaru Nakamura2,
  • Kaoru Kudo1,
  • Jin Endo1,
  • Katsumi Sanjo1,
  • Kentaro Fukumoto1,
  • Katsuhito Hoshi1,
  • Junko Yagi1 and
  • Akio Sakai1
Annals of General Psychiatry201514:48

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12991-015-0087-6

Received: 28 August 2015

Accepted: 7 December 2015

Published: 30 December 2015

Abstract

Objective

To determine the timing of development of suicidal ideation and factors associated therewith in suicide attempters who required psychiatric emergency treatment.

Methods

Of a total of 2818 suicide attempters in Japan who presented to the primary or secondary emergency department of Iwate Medical University Hospital (hereinafter, referred to as our hospital) or Iwate Prefecture Advanced Emergency and Critical Care Center (hereinafter, referred to as the emergency center), an affiliated institution to our hospital, during the 12-year period from April 1, 2002–March 31, 2014, 2274 patients for whom the timing of development of suicidal ideation was identified were included in the study. The study subjects were classified into three groups according to the timing of development of suicide ideation: the “same-day” group, those who developed suicidal ideation and attempted suicide on the same day; the “short-term” group, those who developed suicidal ideation 2–7 days before attempting suicide; and the “long-term” group, those who developed suicidal ideation more than 7 days before attempting suicide. Factors associated with the development of suicidal ideation in each group were analyzed by a multiple logistic regression analysis with background factors, the diagnosis according to the ICD and the situations before and after the suicide attempt as explanatory variables.

Results

The same-day group was characterized by a high female ratio, high global functioning, low stress level, non-depressed status and a lack of seeking consultation. In contrast, the long-term group was characterized by low global functioning and a high stress level, suggesting that these patients exhibit consultation behavior, but have not received psychiatric services. In the short-term group, only male gender was identified as a significant factor.

Discussion

For those patients who developed suicidal ideation and attempted suicide on the same day, treatment strategies focusing on the acquisition of coping skills and stress management are recommended. For those with suicidal ideation lasting for more than a week or recurrent ideation, early detection and subsequent early treatment of such ideation are essential. In intermediate cases, treatment strategies that make the full use of mental health management in the workplace and gate-keeping are likely to be effective.

Keywords

Suicidal attemptSuicide ideationBrief psychiatric rating scale (BPRS)Global assessment scale (GAS)Life change units of Holmes social readjustment rating scale (LCU)

Background

A suicide attempt develops from suicidal ideation in the presence of complicating factors, such as anxiety, impulsivity and underlying psychiatric disorders. Zimri et al. have suggested that the trigger status of suicide is associated with factors such as the intensity of suicidal ideation, history of suicide attempt and current attempts [1], while others emphasize the importance of frantic hopelessness and loss of control over one’s thinking as underlying triggers for suicidal ideation [2]. Some studies have also suggested that psychic pain, a condition characterized by increasing anxiety and restlessness, is experienced before the occurrence of serious suicide attempts [3], and that acute, intense negative feelings can also trigger suicide [4], [5]. However, suicidal ideation is in many cases a distinct entity, and do not always lead to suicide attempts.

Stress has long been identified as an important factor associated with suicide attempt. Mann et al. reported that the severity of current depression or psychosis cannot predict suicide attempt and proposed a stress-diathesis model composed of suicidal ideation, impulsivity, and feelings leading to suicide attempt [6]. While there are various known risk and protective factors associated with suicidal ideation and suicidal behaviors among young people, a population commonly affected by suicide attempts [7], stress has also been shown to have a role in the development of suicidal ideation in this population [8].

Interaction between stress factors and other pertinent factors may complicate stress management and consequently increase the risk of suicide attempt [9]. Controversy remains regarding the notion that stress is a predictor of suicidal tendency [10]. One study suggested that a high stress level does not predict the development of suicidal ideation because the relationship between depression and suicidal ideation is somewhat relaxed by a sudden stress event [11].

Based on the various perspectives, these facts indicate the importance of further analysis of suicidal ideation, which has a close connection to suicide attempt. Regarding the timing of development of suicidal ideation, the prevalence of suicidal ideation within the 2 weeks before suicide attempt is reported to be 4.8 %. Studies have identified the following factors to be associated with the development of suicidal ideation: male gender, high education level, smoking history, living alone, absence of religious behavior, financial strain, history of childhood abuse, family history of suicide, prior history of depression, current anxiety, coexistence of anxiety and depression, prior history of suicide attempt, indifference to one’s own health, and use of antidepressants, as an indirect indicator of current depression, that not necessarily respond to the given drug [12]. To date, no report has fully explored the relationship between the timing of development of suicidal ideation and the characteristics and psychiatric profile of suicide attempters.

The crisis of the true suicide tends to be settled spontaneously in some period. Most patients can adapt themselves to the feelings that have finished becoming impoverished with the risk of the suicide within 24–48 h. The focus of our study is whether psychiatric staffs can management to suicidal ideation on the day and whether they can cope once a week in a generous limit of the short term treatment and what kind of characteristics the patients who no longer maintain suicidal ideation have [13]. Therefore, in this study, we classified suicide attempters who required psychiatric emergency treatment according to the timing of development of suicidal ideation, with the aim to determine the relationship between the time from the development of suicidal ideation to attempted suicide and the nature of suicide attempt.

Methods

A total of 18,639 patients presented to the primary or secondary emergency department of Iwate Medical University Hospital (hereinafter, referred to as our hospital) or the tertiary emergency department of a hospital-affiliated Advanced Emergency and Critical Care Center (hereinafter, referred to as the emergency center) for psychiatric emergency services during a 12-year period between April 1, 2002 and March 31, 2014.

We use Silverman et al.’s nomenclature for the study of suicidality, and therefore ascribe to their essential components of suicide and suicidal behaviors: suicide ideation, suicide and suicide attempts [14, 15]. Of the total, 2818 patients met the diagnostic criteria for suicide attempt by meeting any of the following criteria: 1) self-statement of suicide attempt, 2) presence of a suicide note or advance notice for suicide, 3) existence of a person witnessing the suicidal behavior, and 4) confirmation by judicial officials or autopsy (Kishi) [16]. Of these 2818 patients, 2274 patients for whom the time of development of suicidal ideation could be identified were included in the analysis (Table 1). Those whose death was confirmed after transportation to the emergency center and those who died within 24 h after admission were defined as suicides
Table 1

Timing of development of suicidal ideation

 

N

%

Time from development of suicidal ideation to suicide attempt (days)

 Same day

1358

59.7

 2–7

492

21.6

 >7

424

18.6

 Total

2274

100.0

The patients were classified into the following three groups according to the timing of development of suicidal ideation: the “same-day” group, consisting of those who developed suicidal ideation and attempted suicide on the same day; the “short-term” group, consisting of those who developed suicidal ideation 2–7 days before attempting suicide; and the “long-term” group, consisting of those who developed suicidal ideation more than 7 days before attempting suicide. Patients of each group were examined for gender, age, years of schooling, living status, work status, history of presentation to psychiatric services, consultation prior to suicide attempt, history of suicide-related behavior (lifetime and during the past year), motives and means of suicide attempt, Asukai grade [a grading system for the seriousness of attempted suicide based on its means and outcome; absolutely dangerous (AD) or relatively dangerous (RD) group (1995)] [17], Japan Coma Scale (JCS), diagnostic classification according to the Mental and behavioral disorders section of the International classification of diseases and related health problems, 10th edition (hereinafter, referred to as ICD-10) [18], and outcome of emergency treatment. Evaluable patients were also evaluated for psychiatric symptoms using the Oxford University Version of the brief psychiatric rating scale (BPRS) (translated into Japanese by Kitamura et al.) [19] and for overall psychiatric symptoms and daily life capacities using the global assessment scale (GAS) (translated into Japanese by Kitamura et al.) [20]. Because the large part of patients did not be able to diagnose the subgroup for an emergency stage, we investigated the classification of the evaluation to main cord (F1-F9, F99). In addition, the subjects’ life events prior to suicide attempts, such as spouse’s death and debts, were scored on a 0–100 scale using life change units (LCU) of the Holmes social readjustment rating scale [21].

Assessment of each investigation item and diagnoses were based on the information obtained from the patients and those surrounding them, such as family members, paramedics, hospital staff and primary care physicians, at the time of emergency psychiatric services. Suicides were evaluated based on the history of presentation to our department immediately before admission, or in the same manner as described above if they were able to talk at the time of presentation. Investigations and evaluations were conducted by 14 psychiatric emergency psychiatrists or psychiatrists on duty at our hospital, under the supervision of a senior psychiatrist (a designated psychiatrist).

SPSS 21.0 J for Windows was used for statistical processing. One-way analysis of variance was used for comparing the means of three groups (the “same-day”, “short-term”, and “long-term” groups), followed by the analysis of difference between two groups using the Bonferroni method. Chi-square test was used for the analysis of ratios among three groups. JCS and LCU data were analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis test.

In order to identify factors associated with the timing of development of suicidal ideation, a multiple logistic analysis with the forced entry method was performed, with all investigation items (gender, age, years of schooling, living status, work status, diagnosis according to the ICD-10, history of presentation to psychiatric services, history of contact with outpatient psychiatric services, consultation prior to suicide attempt, history of suicide attempt during lifetime and the past year, LCU total score, motives of suicide attempt, first/return presentation, BPRS total score, means of suicide attempt, severity of physical condition (AD/RD group), GAS, and outcome) considered as explanatory variables and the “same-day”, “short-term” and “long-term” groups as the dependent variables.

The significance level was set at 5 % in all tests, with probabilities of significance presented numerically. Personally identifiable data were excluded from the analysis. Data were appropriately managed and processed to ensure the protection of personal information. This study was conducted with the approval of the ethics committees at Iwate Medical University School of Medicine.

Results

Background

The same-day group had the largest sample size, followed in order by the short-term and long-term groups. The number of women included was more than twice that of men. The female ratio was especially high in the same-day group compared to the other two groups. The mean age was the highest in the same-day group, followed in order by the short-term and long-term groups. The same-day group had lower percentages of patients who presented for the first time and those who received tertiary emergency services, and higher percentages of patients with prior history of contact with outpatient psychiatric services, history of suicide-related behavior during lifetime or during the past year, and no consultation prior to suicide attempt (Table 2).
Table 2

Results of intergroup comparison

Factor

Entire population N = 2274

Time from development of suicidal ideation to suicide attempt

P value

Multiple comparison and residual analysis

Analytical method

Unknown N = 544

Same day N = 1358

Short-term (2–7 days) N = 492

Long-term (>7 days) N = 424

Male

 N

657

308

188

161

<.001

Shaded area

Chi-square

191

 %

28.9

22.7

38.2

38.0

35.1

Age

 Mean

36.73

34.68

38.36

41.43

<.001

Significant difference among 3 groups

Analysis of variance

40.53

 SD

16.29

15.11

16.62

18.27

17.46

Presentation to tertiary services

 N

1421

802

331

288

<.001

Shaded area

Chi-square

405

 %

62.5

59.1

67.3

67.9

74.4

First-time presentation

 N

1181

629

279

273

<.001

Shaded area

 

297

 %

51.9

46.3

56.7

64.4

54.6

Psychiatric diagnosis

 F0

  N

47

29

12

6

.533

  

17

  %

2.1

2.1

2.4

1.4

   

3.1

 F1

  N

68

49

9

10

.097

  

12

  %

3.0

3.6

1.8

2.4

   

2.2

 F2

  N

310

186

70

54

.802

  

71

  %

13.6

13.7

14.2

12.7

   

13.1

 F3

  N

837

400

210

227

<.001

Shaded area

 

235

  %

36.8

29.5

42.7

53.5

   

43.2

 F4

  N

696

470

132

94

<.001

Shaded area

 

110

  %

30.6

34.6

26.8

22.2

   

20.2

 F6

  N

199

145

39

15

<.001

Shaded area

 

33

  %

8.8

10.7

7.9

3.5

   

6.1

 Other

 N

117

79

20

18

.208

  

67

 %

5.1

5.8

4.1

4.2

   

12.3

Prior history of suicide attempt

 During the past year

  N

919

611

152

156

<.001

Shaded area

 

163

  %

40.4

45.0

30.9

36.8

   

30.0

 During lifetime

  N

1297

848

239

210

<.001

Shaded area

 

245

  %

57.0

62.4

48.6

49.5

   

45.0

No consultation prior to suicide attempt

 N

1453

942

297

214

<.001

Shaded area

  

 %

63.9

69.4

60.4

50.5

    

Currently receiving outpatient psychiatric treatment

 N

1411

907

273

231

<.001

Shaded area

  

 %

62.0

66.8

55.5

54.5

    

Means of suicide attempt

 Drug

  N

1221

796

260

165

<.001

Shaded area

 

276

  %

53.7

58.6

52.8

38.9

   

50.7

 Poisoning

  N

137

65

34

38

.004

Shaded area

 

32

  %

6.0

4.8

6.9

9.0

   

5.9

 Inhaling gas

  N

77

27

26

24

<.001

Shaded area

 

34

  %

3.4

2.0

5.3

5.7

   

6.2

 Jumping from a tall building

  N

90

49

16

25

.072

  

32

  %

4.0

3.6

3.3

5.9

   

5.9

 Jumping in front of a train

  N

9

6

1

2

.742

  

1

  %

.4

.4

.2

.5

   

.2

 Knife

  N

399

233

82

84

.385

  

61

  %

17.5

17.2

16.7

19.8

   

11.2

 Self-burning

 N

22

10

7

5

.364

  

19

 %

1.0

.7

1.4

1.2

   

3.5

 Drowning oneself

  N

29

16

4

9

.187

  

5

  %

1.3

1.2

.8

2.1

   

.9

 Hanging

  N

104

49

19

36

<.001

Shaded area

 

46

  %

4.6

3.6

3.9

8.5

   

8.5

 Combination

  N

154

88

38

28

.635

  

28

  %

6.8

6.5

7.7

6.6

   

5.1

 Other

  N

18

10

4

4

.914

  

2

%

.8

.7

.8

.9

   

.4

Motives for suicide

 Family problem

  N

502

336

102

64

<.001

Shaded area

 

108

  %

22.1

24.7

20.7

15.1

   

19.9

 Economic difficulties

  N

119

47

40

32

<.001

Shaded area

 

24

  %

5.2

3.5

8.1

7.5

   

4.4

 Pain of sickness

  N

243

112

60

71

<.001

Shaded area

 

69

  %

10.7

8.2

12.2

16.7

   

12.7

 Hallucinations/Delusion

  N

157

82

37

38

.097

  

17

  %

6.9

6.0

7.5

9.0

   

3.1

 Work problem

  N

194

98

54

42

.020

Shaded area

 

34

  %

8.5

7.2

11.0

9.9

   

6.2

 Inter-personal relationship

  N

391

257

87

47

.001

Shaded area

 

60

  %

17.2

18.9

17.7

11.1

   

11.0

 School problem

  N

24

15

3

6

.474

  

2

  %

1.1

1.1

.6

1.4

   

.4

 Other

  N

84

64

13

7

.005

Shaded area

 

12

  %

3.7

4.7

2.6

1.7

   

2.2

 Combination

  N

431

247

86

98

.050

  

97

  %

19.0

18.2

17.5

23.1

   

17.8

 Unknown

  N

129

100

10

19

<.001

Shaded area

 

121

  %

5.7

7.4

2.0

4.5

   

12.2

Living with someone

 N

1826

1073

400

353

.154

  

420

 %

80.3

79.0

81.3

83.3

   

77.2

Years of schooling

 Mean

11.70

11.69

11.78

11.64

.663

 

Analysis of variance

11.63

 SD

2.35

2.19

2.39

2.75

  

2.25

Being at work

 N

786

458

177

151

.110

  

163

 %

34.6

33.7

36.0

35.6

   

30.0

JCS

 Mean

211.41

196.85

228.89

236.80

.104

 

Kruskal–Wallis

103.85

 SD

373.87

362.48

386.16

392.83

  

128.43

AD (Asukai classification)

 N

313

129

79

105

<.001

Shaded area

Chi-square

120

 %

13.8

9.5

16.1

24.8

  

22.1

BPRS

 Mean

18.60

17.84

19.10

20.52

<.001

Significant difference between the same-day group and the other groups

Analysis of variance

12.36

 SD

11.59

11.44

10.96

12.56

  

9.80

GAS

 Mean

34.74

37.16

32.99

29.08

<.001

Significant difference among 3 groups

 

24.81

 SD

19.26

19.80

17.77

17.78

   

18.55

LCU

 Mean

41.70

31.852

29.225

39.378

<.001

Significant difference among 3 groups

Kruskal–Wallis

52.84

 SD

33.40

.981

1.476

2.056

  

37.24

Outcome

 Discharged home

  N

670

471

101

98

<.001

Shaded area

 

114

  %

30.2

35.3

21.0

24.3

  

22.2

 Admitted to emergency care center

  N

592

322

147

123

.004

Shaded area

Chi-square

153

  %

26.7

24.1

30.6

30.4

  

29.8

 Admitted to psychiatric department

  N

937

532

225

180

.016

Shaded area

 

230

  %

42.2

39.9

46.9

44.6

   

44.8

 Suicide

  N

36

16

6

14

.007

Shaded area

 

52

  %

1.6

1.2

1.2

3.3

   

9.6

Diagnosis, psychiatric parameters, means of suicide attempt and outcome

With respect to the ICD-10 classification, the distribution of mood disorder (F3), neurotic disorder (F4) and personality disorder (F6) significantly varied among three groups, with a higher percentage of F3 and lower percentages of F4 and F6 in the same-day group compared to the other groups.

Regarding the general health performance (GAS average), significant differences were recognized among the three groups, with the long-term group having the highest level of seriousness, followed in order by the short-term and same-day groups. The score for psychiatric symptoms (BPRS total score) was higher in the same-day group compared to the long-term group while the score for life events (LCU average) was the highest in the short-term group, followed in order by the same-day and long-term groups. In terms of motives of suicide attempt, the same-day group had higher percentages of family problems, interpersonal relationship, other, and unknown motive, and a lower percentage of economic difficulties. Higher percentages of work problem and pain of sickness were observed in the short-term and long-term groups, respectively.

Among the means of suicide attempt, drug was the most common in all three groups and its percentage was the highest in the same-day group. The long-term group had higher percentages of poisoning and hanging compared to the other two groups. The percentage of inhaling gas was lower in the same-day group than the other groups. The percentage of patients classified in the AD group according to Asukai’s criteria was the highest in the long-term group (24.8 %).

As for outcome, the percentage of patients discharged home was the highest in same-day group, and the percentages of patients admitted to the emergency center or psychiatric department in the same-day group were higher than the corresponding percentages in the short-term group. There were a total of 36 suicides (1.6 %) and the percentage of suicides was the highest in the long-term group (14 patients, 3.3 %) (Table 2).

Logistic regression analysis

Significant variables identified in the same-day group included male gender (OR = .682), mood disorder [F3] (OR = .536), consultation prior to suicide attempt (OR = .564), motives of economic difficulties (OR = .415), pain of sickness (OR = .453) and work problem (OR = .391), GAS score (OR = 1.011), and LCU score (OR = .996). In the short-term group, male gender (OR = 1.436) was identified as a significant variable. In the long-term group, first-time presentation (OR = 1.486), consultation prior to suicide attempt (OR = 1925), suicide attempt by drug (OR = .237), GAS score (OR = .986) and LCU (OR = 1.007) were identified as significant variables (Table 3).
Table 3

The result of the logistic analysis of each group

Variables in the equation

Same-day group (N = 1358)

Short-term group (N = 492)

Long-term group (N = 424)

OR

95 % CI

OR

95 % CI

OR

95 % CI

Lower

Upper

P value

Lower

Upper

P value

Lower

Upper

P value

Male (female)

.682

.521

.894

.006

1.436

1.061

1.944

.019

1.154

.833

1.599

.389

Age

.996

.988

1.005

.375

1.000

.990

1.009

.941

1.005

.995

1.016

.311

Tertiary (primary/secondary)

.921

.699

1.213

.557

1.035

.752

1.425

.833

1.090

.769

1.543

.629

First presentation (return)

.816

.634

1.050

.114

.933

.697

1.248

.639

1.486

1.085

2.036

.014

Diagnosis

            

 F0

.898

.361

2.233

.817

1.906

.707

5.140

.202

.459

.126

1.678

.239

 F1

1.598

.674

3.787

.287

.527

.177

1.569

.250

.953

.329

2.756

.929

 F2

.766

.405

1.450

.413

1.515

.712

3.224

.281

.896

.396

2.026

.792

 F3

.536

.302

.950

.033

1.242

.625

2.467

.536

1.853

.905

3.793

.092

 F4

.904

.511

1.601

.729

1.034

.520

2.056

.924

1.071

.517

2.218

.854

 F6

.969

.499

1.881

.926

1.641

.757

3.558

.210

.485

.190

1.239

.131

Prior history of suicide attempt

            

 History of suicide attempt during the past year

1.212

.868

1.691

.259

.593

.404

.870

.008

1.287

.837

1.981

.250

 History of suicide attempt during lifetime

1.043

.757

1.437

.799

.982

.689

1.401

.922

.925

.615

1.392

.708

Consultation prior to suicide attempt (no consultation)

.564

.449

.707

.000

1.198

.924

1.552

.172

1.925

1.462

2.535

.000

Prior contact with outpatient psychiatric service (no prior contact)

1.157

.890

1.503

.275

.830

.616

1.120

.223

.995

.722

1.372

.976

Means of suicide attempt

            

 Drug

3.005

.603

14.970

.179

1.131

.127

10.049

.912

.237

.047

1.206

.083

 Poisoning

2.336

.441

12.361

.318

1.141

.121

10.716

.908

.350

.064

1.928

.228

 Inhaling gas

1.838

.320

10.552

.495

1.244

.126

12.270

.852

.366

.062

2.147

.266

 Jumping from a tall building

2.572

.461

14.356

.281

.684

.067

6.985

.749

.458

.079

2.662

.385

 Jumping in front of a train

8.346

.547

127.353

.127

.781

.035

17.325

.876

.000

.000

 

.999

 Knife

2.420

.479

12.233

.285

.924

.102

8.363

.944

.396

.077

2.046

.269

 Self-burning

5.057

.728

35.130

.101

.755

.062

9.189

.826

.194

.023

1.620

.130

 Drowning oneself

1.340

.196

9.144

.765

.682

.054

8.595

.767

.972

.142

6.644

.977

 Hanging

3.025

.547

16.736

.205

.604

.060

6.088

.669

.408

.072

2.322

.313

 Combination

1.918

.371

9.926

.437

1.641

.179

15.054

.661

.298

.055

1.605

.159

 Other

2.874

.391

21.104

.299

1.161

.090

14.959

.909

.265

.028

2.529

.248

Motives for suicide attempt outcome

            

 Family problem

.826

.417

1.635

.583

1.221

.552

2.702

.623

1.144

.440

2.977

.782

 Economic difficulties

.415

.187

.921

.031

1.659

.678

4.063

.268

2.095

.737

5.952

.165

 Pain of sickness

.453

.215

.958

.038

1.471

.621

3.487

.381

2.234

.826

6.039

.113

 Hallucinations/Delusion

.580

.265

1.271

.174

1.214

.489

3.015

.676

2.139

.744

6.144

.158

 Work problem

.391

.186

.825

.014

1.729

.739

4.046

.207

2.344

.862

6.372

.095

 Interpersonal relationship

.571

.285

1.144

.114

1.524

.681

3.411

.305

1.526

.575

4.049

.396

 Combined motives

.588

.297

1.163

.127

1.290

.582

2.857

.531

1.844

.718

4.740

.204

 School problem

.555

.156

1.977

.363

.718

.132

3.906

.701

3.616

.787

16.613

.098

 Unknown motive

1.577

.665

3.741

.301

.418

.136

1.286

.128

1.112

.354

3.495

.856

 Living with someone (alone)

.776

.579

1.040

.089

1.265

.898

1.782

.180

1.131

.788

1.623

.505

 Years of schooling

.999

.952

1.049

.973

.991

.938

1.048

.756

1.012

.954

1.074

.684

 Being at work (not working)

1.074

.837

1.379

.573

.951

.715

1.266

.731

.949

.697

1.291

.738

 JCS

1.000

.999

1.000

.378

1.000

1.000

1.000

.935

1.000

1.000

1.001

.375

 AD group (RD)

.707

.484

1.033

.073

1.073

.707

1.629

.741

1.406

.918

2.152

.117

 Total BPRS

.991

.979

1.002

.104

1.001

.988

1.015

.830

1.012

.999

1.026

.076

 GAS

1.011

1.004

1.017

.001

.997

.990

1.004

.450

.986

.978

.994

.001

 LCU

.996

.993

1.000

.047

.998

.994

1.002

.363

1.007

1.003

1.011

.001

Outcome

            

 Discharged home

1.234

.230

6.608

.806

.628

.113

3.480

.594

1.351

.134

13.674

.799

 Admitted to emergency center

1.361

.253

7.334

.720

.711

.128

3.943

.696

1.023

.102

10.303

.984

 Admitted to psychiatric department

.942

.177

5.014

.944

.843

.154

4.621

.844

1.476

.148

14.774

.740

Variables included: gender, age, primary/secondary/tertiary services, first/return presentation, f0, f1, f2, f3, f4, f6, with or without SMI 1 year for presentation/absence and logistic analysis, with or without history of SMV for logistic analysis, with or without prior consultation for logistic analysis, contact with outpatient psychiatric analysis for logistic analysis, drug, poisoning, inhaling gas, jumping from a tall building, jumping in front of a train, knife, self-burning, drowning oneself, hanging, combination, other, family problem, economic difficulties, pain of sickness, hallucination/delusion, work problem, interpersonal relationship, combined motives, school problem, unknown motive, living with someone or alone, years of schooling, work status, JCS, ADRD, total BPRS, GAS, LCU, discharged home or not, admitted to emergency center or not, admitted to psychiatric department or not

Discussion

Variables identified by a multivariate analysis as differentiating the three groups were gender, first/return presentation, F3 component of the ICD-10, consultation prior to suicide attempt, drug as a means of suicide attempt, economic difficulties, pain of sickness and work problem as motives for suicide attempt, LCU, and GAS.

Same-day group

Suicidal ideation that occurred on the day of suicide attempt was significantly associated with female gender, being not depressed, no consultation prior to suicide attempt, suicide attempt by means of drug, suicide attempt not motivated by economic difficulties, pain of sickness or work problem, low LCU, and high GAS. Global function was rated high, suggesting the involvement of vulnerability in coping with stress, with which even life events of low stress levels can lead to suicidal ideation.

Not all suicide-related behaviors are intended for death; some behaviors serve as a subconscious signal for help. Such help-seeking behaviors are particularly notable in women, and are grouped under the concept of “parasuicides” [22, 23]. In the same-day group, it appeared that help-seeking behavior that occurred before suicide attempt did not directly lead to consultation or treatment and did not prevent suicide attempt. Regarding life events, suicide attempts in young people are likely to be triggered by interpersonal relationship-related events, and this risk appears to be higher for women than for men [24, 25]. In order to reduce stress, it is important to maintain good quality of life and integrate problem coping and solving [26]. Ibrahim et al. have suggested that coping skills required for pain management should be reinforced to reduce depression and suicide among young people [26]. In order to prevent the development of suicidal ideation followed by suicide attempt on the same day, supports are needed to facilitate the acquisition of stress management and stress coping skills and the control of mental conditions that can easily lead to direct actions, such as anxiety and impulsivity.

A higher percentage of patients in the same-day group had history of prior suicide attempt and were on outpatient psychiatric treatment compared to the other groups. It should be noted that parasuicide cases who do not have physically serious conditions and have exhibited suicide-related behaviors several times, and those whose suicidal feelings were temporarily weakened after an attempt due to its cathartic effect [27], are very likely to repeat their attempts, finally with a higher rate of fatality [28, 29, 30]. Joiner et al. have identified “acquired suicide potential” as a key risk factor for suicide [31]. This represents an insensitivity to physical pain and lack of fear for suicide acquired through repeated suicide-related behaviors and other similar experiences. These experiences appear to serve as a type of “rehearsal” for suicide and reduce the threshold for suicidal behaviors [32]. Even if a patient is judged to be safe enough to return home after outpatient treatment, it is necessary to determine the process by which he/she came to try to kill him/herself, and to provide careful treatment, such as the introduction of proper psychotherapy or encouragement to visit a psychiatrist in the future. A relatively short interval from the development of suicidal ideation to occurrence of suicide attempt also suggests the need for the proactive use of psychiatric emergency and hot-line call services and providing support to the patient’s family and the surrounding people.

Short-term group

In the short-term group, only male gender was identified as a significant variable associated with the development of suicide ideation. It is more likely that, compared to women, men do not consult with the people around them prior to suicide attempt and often refuse to see a psychiatrist, even if the people around them notice changes and encourage them to see a psychiatrist. It has also been suggested that men tend to have too much stress themselves without consulting the people around them, and develop psychological tunnel vision [33]. The first thing to be done is to vigorously promote mental health management in the workplace to prevent the development of suicidal ideation and the occurrence of suicide attempt. Given an interval of 1 week from suicidal ideation to attempt, strategies that make the full use of gate-keeping will be effective in preventing these events.

Specifically, it is important to prevent suicide attempts that can occur within a limited time frame by assessing items identified as significant factors in the same-day and long-term groups, such as a history of presentation to psychiatric services, opportunity for consultation prior to suicide attempt, global seriousness, and stressful life events. For example, a treatment strategy consisting of a combination of various types of care has been shown to reduce the severity of depressive symptoms and the development of suicidal ideation among elderly depressed patients [30]. A substantial effect is likely to be achieved by a comprehensive treatment strategy consisting of counseling services that address stress coping, social work services that support problem solving, and drug therapy that includes impulsivity control in its scope.

Long-term group

In the long-term group, which consisted of those who attempted suicide more than a week after the development of suicidal ideation, significant factors associated with the development of suicidal ideation included first-time presentation, consultation prior to suicide attempt, no use of a drug as a means of suicide attempt, life events associated with a high stress level, and severely impaired global functioning.

This group is characterized by no previous contact with psychiatric services even after consultation with surrounding people. It is well known that suicides tend to have no previous contact with psychiatric services before committing suicidal behavior [ 34]. In these cases, where serious untreated episodes are likely to be present, the condition itself may direct the patient to use a serious means of suicide other than drugs, or the presence of untreated episodes itself may prevent them from selecting drugs as a means of suicide attempt. Our previous study has demonstrated that lower GAS is associated with an increased frequency of suicide attempts by dangerous means and that GAS predicts the occurrence of dangerous suicide attempt, regardless of gender, age, or even disease entity [35]. Although no correlation to the emergence of AD group was identified in the present study, it should be noted that the selection of a non-drug means of suicide attempt may lead to serious consequences. Although no significant difference was found in the distribution of outcomes among groups, the long-term group had a slightly higher percentage of suicides (3.3 %) compared to the other groups.

Disorders characterized by impulse-control and anxiety may be the most important in predicting the transition from suicidal ideation to suicide attempt [36]. Having not received any treatment indicates that these problems also remain unsolved. Monitoring of these risk factors is essential when conducting risk assessment [37]. Monitoring the impact of early-life and recent events in vulnerable individuals should be part of risk assessment and treatment [37]. In conclusion, for patients with persistent suicidal ideation, the problem-solving approaches should be selected based on a focus on life events associated with high stress levels. These patients should also be introduced to psychiatric treatment through procedures such as screening and gate-keeping.

Limitations and future research

Although this was a large scale study involving more than 2000 suicide attempters, the investigation was performed at a single institution. The study population also included 544 patients with unknown timing of development of suicidal ideation. This group of patients (the “unknown” group) had a lower female ratio compared to the same-day group, was older compared to the short-term group, and younger than the long-term group. The “unknown” group also had relatively higher percentages of patients with a history of contact with outpatient psychiatric services (63.9 %), and patients with a prior history of suicide attempt during the past year (>40 %) or lifetime (57 %). This group also included a relatively high percentage of patients presenting to tertiary emergency services, including those from whom detailed descriptions of suicidal ideation could not be obtained after awakening from unconsciousness, and those who were not sure of the precise time of onset of suicidal ideation.

Conclusion

The present study revealed varying characteristics of suicide attempters depending on the timing of onset of suicidal ideation. The group of patients who attempted suicide within 24 h after the development of suicidal ideation was characterized by a higher female ratio, lack of consultation behavior, life events associated with a low stress level, and high global functioning. These patients are likely to be effectively treated by treatment strategies focusing on the acquisition of coping skills and stress management. The long-term group was characterized by life events associated with high stress levels, severely impaired global functioning, and no previous contact with psychiatric services even after consultation with the surrounding people. For these patients with persistent or recurrent suicidal ideation, early control of symptoms and the utilization of social resources with problem-solving intention are necessary. For the short-term group, suicide risk should be reduced by taking into account the factors which were identified as being significantly associated with the development of suicidal ideation in the same-day and long-term groups.

The present results did not provide insight into the relationship between the timing of development of suicidal ideation and outcome. No significant difference was found in terms of diagnostic category, except for diagnoses other than depression in the same-day group, suggesting a greater role of overall psychiatric severity, rather than specific psychiatric conditions, in predicting the outcome of suicide attempts. Future tasks include a more detailed assessment of suicide risk, taking into account factors in addition to the timing of onset of suicidal ideation.

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

KO wrote the paper. AS supervised and wrote the paper. HN participated in the design of the study and performed the statistical analysis. KK, JE, KS, KF, KH, and JY participated in the study as a whole and commented on the manuscript. AS conceived the study, and participated in its design and coordination. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our heartfelt gratitude to the medical staff at the Department of Emergency Medicine and the Department of Neuropsychiatry, Iwate Medical University, for their cooperation in conducting this study.

Competing interests

This study was supported by research grant from Medical Service Bureau of Iwate Prefecture.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Disaster and Community Psychiatry, Iwate Medical University
(2)
Department of Neuropsychiatry, Iwate Medical University

References

  1. Yaseen ZS, Gilmer E, Modi J, Cohen LJ, Galynke II. Emergency room validation of the revised suicide trigger scale (STS-3): a measure of a hypothesized suicide trigger State. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(9):e45157. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0045157PMCID:PMC3443232 (Published online).PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Galynker I, Yaseen Z, Briggs J. Assessing risk for imminent suicide. Psychiatr Ann. 2014;44(9):431–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Fawcett J. Depressive Disorders. In: Simon RI, Hales RE, editors. Textbook of suicide assessment and management. New York: Am Psychiatr Publ; 2006. p. 1–24.Google Scholar
  4. Hendin H, Al Jurdi RK, Houck PR, Hughes S, Turner JB. Role of intense affects in predicting short-term risk for suicidal behavior: a prospective study. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2010;198(3):220–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Hendin H, Maltsberger JT, Szanto K. The role of intense affective states in signaling a suicide crisis. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2007;195(5):363–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Mann JJ, Waternaux C, Haas GL, Malone KM. Toward a clinical model of suicidal behavior in psychiatric patients. Am J Psychiatry. 1999;156(2):181–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Gutierrez PM, Osman A. Adolescent suicide: an integrated approach to the assessment of risk and protective factors. DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press; 2008.Google Scholar
  8. Overholser JC. Predisposing factors in suicide attempts: life stressors. In: Spirito A, Overholser J, editors. Evaluating and treating adolescent suicide attempters: from research to practice. New York: Academic Press; 2003. p. 42–9.Google Scholar
  9. Lee SI, Jung H. Psychosocial risk factors for suicide. Psychiatr Invest. 2006;3:15–22.Google Scholar
  10. Zhang XY, Wang HP, Xia Y, Liu XH, Jung EJ. Stress, coping and suicide ideation in Chinese college students. J Adolesc. 2011;35:1–8.Google Scholar
  11. Yen S, Shea MT, Pagno M, Sanislow CA, Grilo CM. Axis I and axis II disorders as predictors of prospective suicide attempts: findings from the collaborative longitudinal personality disorders study. J Abnorm Psychol. 2003;112:375–81.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Almeida OP, Draper B, Snowdon J, Lautenschlager NT, Pirkis J, Byrne G, Sim M, Stocks N, Flicker L, Pfaff JJ. Factors associated with suicidal thoughts in a large community study of older adults. Br J Psychiatry. 2012;201:466–72. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.112.110130.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Chiles JA, Strosahl KD. Clinical manual for assessment and treatment of suicidal patients. Washington DC and London, UK: American Psychiatric Publishing Inc; 2005.Google Scholar
  14. Silverman MM, Berman AL, Sanddal ND, O’carroll PW, Joiner TE. Rebuilding the tower of Babel: a revised nomenclature for the study of suicide and suicidal behaviors. Part 1: background, rationale, and methodology. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2007;37(3):248–63.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Silverman MM, Berman AL, Sanddal ND, O’carroll PW, Joiner TE. Rebuilding the tower of Babel: a revised nomenclature for the study of suicide and suicidal behaviors. Part 2: suicide-related ideations, communications, and behaviors. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2007;37(3):264–77.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Kishi Y, Hosaka T, Kurosawa H. Proposal for establishment of suicide statistics at emergency care centers. J Clin Exp Med. 2000;194:555–9.Google Scholar
  17. Asukai N. Suicide and mental disorders. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1995;49:91–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. World Health Organization. The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines—version 1. Tokyo: Igaku-Shoin; 1993.Google Scholar
  19. Kitamura T, Machizawa S, Maruyama S, et al. Retest reliability of the Oxford University version of the brief psychiatric rating scale (BPRS): a preliminary investigation of a multi-center study sponsored by the National Institute of Mental Health. J Natl Inst Ment Health. 1986;32:1–5.Google Scholar
  20. Endicott J, Spitzer RL, Fleiss JL, et al. The global assessment scale: a procedure for measuring overall severity of psychiatric disturbances. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1976;33:766–71.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Holmes TH. Life situations, emotions, and disease. Psychosomatics. 1978;19:747–54.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Suzuki H. The realities of attempted suicides at the emergency service of a university hospital. J Clin Exp Med. 2000;194:541–4.Google Scholar
  23. Okamoto K, Sakata Y, Shimokawa K, et al. Sex difference in help-seeking behaviors. J J Psychosom Med. 2002;42(10):689.Google Scholar
  24. Bridge JA, Goldestein TR, Brent DA. Adolescent suicide and suicide behavior. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2006;46:372–94.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Hawton K, van Heeringen K. Suicide. Lancet. 2009;373:1372–81.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Ibrahim N, Amit N, Suen MW. Psychological factors as predictors of suicidal ideation among adolescents in Malaysia. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(10):e110670. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0110670 (eCollection 2014).PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Matsuishi K, Kitamura N, Sato M, et al. Change of suicidal ideation induced by suicide attempt. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2005;59:599–604.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Jenkins GR, Hale R, Papanastassiou M, et al. Suicide rate 22 years after parasuicide: cohort study. BMJ. 2002;325:1155.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Suokas J, Suominen K, Isometsä E, et al. Long-term risk factors for suicide mortality after attempted suicide—findings of a 14-year follow-up study. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2001;104:117–21.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Suominen K, Isometsä E, Suokas J, et al. Completed suicide after a suicide attempt: a 37-year follow-up study. Am J Psychiatry. 2004;161:562–3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Joiner TE Jr, Van Orden KA, Witte TK, et al. The interpersonal theory of suicide: guidance for working with suicidal clients. Washington: American Psychological Association; 2009.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Schnaideman ES. Suicide as Psychache: a clinical approach to self-destructive behavior. Kongo Shuppan: Tokyo; 2005. p. 37.Google Scholar
  33. Bruce ML, Ten Have TR, Reynolds CF, Katz II, Schulberg HC, Mulsant BH, et al. Reducing suicidal ideation and depressive symptoms in depressed older primary care patients: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2004;291:1081–91.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Vassilas C, Morgan H. Elderly suicides’ contact with their general practitioner before death. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 1994;9:1008–9.Google Scholar
  35. Endo J, Otsuka K, Yoshida T, Nakamura H, Yambe T, Isono H, Chida F. On factors related to risk to life in attempted suicides: comparison between absolutely and relatively dangerous suicides in emergency and critical care center. J J Assoc Emerg Psychiatry. 2009;12:60–73.Google Scholar
  36. Borges G, Nock MK, Abad JMH, Hwang I, Sampson NA, Alonso J, Andrade LH, Angermeyer MC, Beautrais A, Bromet E, Bruffaerts R, de Girolamo G, Florescu S, Gureje O, Hu C, Karam EG, Kovess-Masfety V, Lee S, Levinson D, Medina-Mora ME, Ormel J, Posada-Villa J, Sagar R, Tomov T, Uda H, Williams DR, Kessler RC. Twelve Month prevalence of and risk factors for suicide attempts in the WHO World Mental Health Surveys. J Clin Psychiatry. 2010;71(12):1617–28.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Pompili M, Innamorati M, Szanto K, Di Vittorio C, Conwell Y, Lester D, Tatarelli R, Girardi P, Amore M. Life events as precipitants of suicide attempts among first-time suicide attempters, repeaters, and non-attempters. Psychiatry Res. 2011;186(2–3):300–5. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2010.09.003.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Otsuka et al. 2015