Skip to main content

Trends in Mental Health: A Review of the Most Influential Research on Depression in Children and Adolescents

Abstract

Background

Depression is a common mental disorder in children and adolescents, with a global prevalence of approximately 33%, severely affecting their physical, mental health, and academic performance. This study aims to identify and assess the 100 most-cited articles (T100 articles) on depression in children and adolescents.

Methods

The T100 articles in the field of depression were retrieved from the SCI-E and SSCI databases. A comprehensive analysis of the T100 articles was conducted, including the number of citations, countries, journals, keywords, authors, and topics.

Results

Between 1981 and 2021, T100 articles in child and adolescent depression received 423 to 3949 citations. Most articles originated from the USA, with Kovacs M as the top-ranked author. The University of Pittsburgh and Columbia University published the top two T100 articles. The T100 articles were published in 36 journals, led by AMA Psychiatry. Co-occurrence keywords analyses reveal six key foci: Pathogenesis of Depression, Treatment of MDD in Children, Early Childhood Treatment, Adolescent Depression Manifestations, Gender and Depression, and Primary Care Considerations, with pathogenesis as a future trend.

Conclusions

Our research presents an exhaustive list of the most highly cited articles on depression in children and adolescents. Our findings not only underscore the significance of international cooperation but also reveal a pressing need to prioritize and bolster preventive research, particularly the development and refinement of early screening and intervention programs.

Introduction

Depression, once primarily perceived as a challenge faced by adults, has now emerged as a critical concern spanning all age groups, including children and adolescents [1]. Depression persists for prolonged durations, adversely affecting the patient’s daily life, social functionality, and comprehension of self and the surrounding world [2]. The evolving understanding of depression’s demographic distribution calls for a reassessment of its societal implications [3, 4]. The COVID-19 pandemic, in particular, has been linked to a significant increase in depression diagnosis rates, highlighting the need for a comprehensive approach to mental health support [5]. In a word, depression is no longer a niche issue; rather, it has become a global public health concern that necessitates urgent attention and action.

The impacts of depression on children and adolescents are multifaceted and profoundly concerning. The prevalence and severity of depressive disorders in this age group are particularly high, demanding urgent attention [6]. Depressed children and adolescents often struggle with educational achievements, experiencing difficulties in concentration, motivation, and academic performance [7]. This can significantly hinder their chances of success in school and future careers. Socially, depression can have a detrimental impact on children and adolescents’ ability to engage in meaningful interactions with peers and family members [8]. The withdrawal, isolation, and difficulty in expressing emotions can lead to a breakdown in relationships and a sense of loneliness. Moreover, depression can have a profound impact on children and adolescents’ overall well-being [9]. It can cause a loss of interest in activities that were once enjoyable, lead to feelings of hopelessness and worthlessness, and diminish one’s sense of purpose and meaning. Comparative analyses reveal that adolescents suffering from depression and anxiety engage in risky behaviors, such as binge eating and smoking, at significantly higher rates than their healthy peers [10]. These behaviors can further exacerbate the depressive symptoms and lead to a cycle of unhealthy coping mechanisms. Furthermore, the suicide rate among depressed adolescents is alarmingly high, reaching 1.81 times the average among the general adolescent population [11]. This statistic underscores the urgency of addressing depression in children and adolescents and the need for comprehensive and strategic approaches to prevention and intervention.

Existing literature reviews give significant insights into the present status of research on depression in children and adolescents. However, these reviews have limitations in terms of scope and depth. For example, a study using the method of science mapping scrutinized the research trajectory of child and adolescent depression from 1970 to 2019, yet it omitted an evaluation of the quality of the papers included [12]. Another systematic review limited its scope to subthreshold depression, a state that doesn’t meet the diagnostic criteria for major depression [13]. Furthermore, the limitations of traditional literature analysis methods struggle to effectively identify and track key studies and research trends, which is crucial for grasping the direction of development in this field.

To solve these limitations and gain a deeper understanding of the research landscape, this study employs bibliometric analysis, a valuable tool for evaluating the impact of research articles [14]. Citation counts serve as a valuable indicator of an article’s contribution to the field and its overall significance [15]. By leveraging this approach, we will conduct a rigorous analysis of the top 100 most-cited articles in the field of childhood and adolescent depression. The objective is to identify the key research questions and future research directions in this field and to provide valuable references for researchers, clinicians, and policymakers.

Methods

Search strategy

A literature search was conducted on November 25, 2023, using the Web of Science Core Collection (WoS-CC), specifically the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-E) and Social Science Citation Index (SSCI) databases. The WoS covers a wide range of publications from different fields, has become the preferred choice among numerous scholars as a digital repository for academic literature, particularly for conducting bibliometric studies [16, 17]. This extensive coverage guarantees that the retrieved data is both broad and indicative of the entire field. An advanced search strategy was employed utilizing the following search string: TS = (children OR child* OR teen* OR youth* OR adolescent OR adolescen* OR teenager OR youngster) AND TS = (depress* OR depressive disorder* OR depressive symptom* OR depression).

Eligibility criteria

We excluded studies unrelated to depressive symptoms, literature reviews, editorials, and consensus statements. Our analysis included studies on children and adolescents (< 18 years old) that explored depressive symptoms.

Bibliometric analysis

Visualization was constructed using the free software VOSviewer and CiteSpace with some elements to get a visual form of the bibliometric analysis. VOSviewer and CiteSpace present the overall external characteristics of a subject area and offer unique advantages in cluster analysis. Pajek is a data visualization and analysis tool that optimizes the layout of the visualizations drawn by VOSviewer. Most of the graphs covered in the article are based on the combined application of these three software, while other graphs are realized with the help of Excel software.

Data extraction and conversion

We downloaded and processed all relevant data from the WoS core database. To eliminate time bias, we used the Average Citations per Year (ACY) to measure the impact of each publication. ACY is calculated as the total number of citations for a publication divided by the number of years since its publication [18]. ACY = citation times/(2023-publication year + 1).

Results

An initial exploration of the Web of Science Core Collection identified over 110,000 documents on the topic of depression in children and adolescents. Table 1 presents the 100 most cited articles on this topic, including their journals, citation counts, and average citations per year (ACY). Reviews comprised 12% of the article types within this top 100 list.

Table 1 The top 100 cited articles in depression among children and adolescents

Year of publication

The 100 most cited articles were published between 1981 and 2021 (Fig. 1). Two publication peaks emerged: 1998–2001 and 2004–2007. Both 2001 and 2006 saw the highest number of publications (7 each). The list includes the oldest articles on childhood depression: “Rating Scales to Assess Depression in School-Aged Children [19]” (1701 citations) by M. Kovacs (1981) and “The Validity of Depressive Disorder in Childhood and the Development of a Self-Rating Scale: A Research Report [20]” (600 citations) by P. Birleson (1981). The most recent article, “Global Prevalence of Depressive and Anxiety Symptoms in Children and Adolescents During COVID-19: A Meta-analysis” by N. Racine et al. (2021), boasts 760 citations [21]. However, no articles published in 2022 or 2023 are included in this top 100 list.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The number of publications on depression in children and adolescents per year

Citations

A citation analysis was conducted on the 100 selected articles using the Web of Science Core Collection (WoS-CC). The total citation count for the articles was 69,145. The number of citations per article ranged from 423 to 3,949, with an average of 691.45 citations per article. Furthermore, 64% of the articles received at least 500 citations, and 14% received more than 1,000 citations. The most cited article was “The Children’s Depression Inventory (CDI)” by M. Kovacs (1985), published in Psychological Bulletin [22]. This article also had the sixth-highest average citations per year (ACY) score. The least cited article was “A randomized trial of a group cognitive intervention for preventing depression in adolescent offspring of depressed parents”, by Clarke et al. (2001), published in Archives of General Psychiatry [23]. Figure 2 displays the annual total citations and average article citations per year. The year 1998 saw the highest total number of citations, reaching 4,839.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Annual Citation Trends: This figure shows both the average number of citations received per year (yellow bars) and the average total number of citations accumulated (green shaded area) by published articles across different years

Contributing journals

The 100 articles were published in 36 journals (Fig. 3). JAMA Psychiatry led publication counts (n = 17) and total citations (10,167), followed by the Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (n = 12, 7,135 citations) and the Journal of Abnormal Psychology (n = 7, 5,468 citations).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Journal Co-Citation Network: This figure shows the relationships between journals based on citations. Circles represent journals that published at least four articles (indicated by circle size) within the 100 most cited list. The color intensity of each circle represents the total citations for all the journal articles on the list (darker = more citations)

Contributing countries, authors, and organizations

The United States led publication output (79 articles, 80% citations) in WoS-CC, followed by the United Kingdom (n = 6175 citations; 9%), Canada (n = 2288 citations; 3%), and Australia (n = 1611 citations; 4%). Figure 4 illustrates the collaboration network between countries for these articles. The United States exhibits a strong emphasis on international collaboration, maintaining partnerships with 14 countries and regions. Notably, collaboration with the United Kingdom is particularly intensive, as indicated by the stronger color of the connecting line in the figure. The co-authoring countries are predominantly concentrated in North America and Europe, with European nations constituting the largest proportion.

Fig. 4
figure 4

International Collaboration in Depression Research: This world map illustrates countries contributing research on childhood and adolescent depression within the top 100 cited articles. The green circle highlights the United States as the nation with the most extensive collaboration network. The curved line color intensity indicates the strength of international co-authorship

Our analysis of 419 author publication records highlighted a collaborative network of 17 authors (Fig. 5), with Lewinsohn PM, Seeley JR, and Ryan ND showing the highest linkage intensity (total link strength = 16 times). M. Kovacs emerged as the most-cited author with 6,669 citations. The top 10 institutions with the highest number of published articles are presented in Table 2. The University of Pittsburgh led publication contributions with 12 articles, followed by Columbia University and the National Institute of Mental Health with 8 and 7 publications, respectively. All top 10 institutions are in the United States. As shown in Fig. 6, despite this concentration, there is extensive global collaboration among institutions and authors.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Author Collaboration Network: This network map visualizes connections between authors who have published more than twice. Circle size reflects the number of top 100 cited articles, and line thickness indicates the strength of collaboration

Table 2 Top 10 most published institutions
Fig. 6
figure 6

The co-authorship network between institutions with more than 3 articles: Circle size corresponds to the count of articles among the 100 most cited, while line thickness reflects the collaboration strength

Keyword analysis

The sample data literature contains a total of 193 keywords, with 37 high-frequency keywords occurring more than 4 times (see Table 3). The keywords in the table are ranked in descending order of frequency, reflecting their occurrence in the research literature. "PSYCHIATRY" tops the list with a high frequency of 52 times and first appeared in 1981, demonstrating its long-term importance in the research of depression in children and adolescents. Keywords such as "sex differences" and "unipolar depression", although appearing less frequently, their first appearance years also reveal the rise of specific research topics. These keywords reflect the research hotspots of the past forty years, and their corresponding nodes can be seen in the visualization map in Fig. 7.

Table 3 High-Frequency Keywords in Child and Adolescent Depression Literature (Threshold ≥ 4)
Fig. 7
figure 7

Network map of keywords analysis with more than 5 articles: Different colors represent different clusters of keywords. The size of the circles indicates the frequency of the terms, and the curves represent the relatedness of the keywords

The network map of keywords analysis can reflect the focus and interdisciplinary situation of depression in children and adolescents research to a certain extent. We analyzed a total of 104 keywords that were identified as appearing more than five times utilizing VOSviewer, which were subsequently categorized into six clusters (Fig. 7). The map is annotated with key terms, where the larger the label, the higher the frequency of the keyword's occurrence; the closer the distance between the labels, the closer their relationship. To understand the correlation between keywords, our study sorted the vocabulary of the six clusters, as shown in Table 4. The red cluster (Pathogenesis of Depression), encompassing 21 keywords, delves into the pathogenesis of depressive disorders in children and adolescents. It focuses on environmental determinants, temperamental and personality attributes, and relevant screening scales. The green cluster (Treatment of MDD in Children), comprising 19 keywords, prioritizes the evaluation and pharmacotherapeutic interventions for major depressive disorder (MDD) in children, particularly the application of escitalopram. The dark blue cluster (Early Childhood Treatment), consisting of 18 keywords, examines the efficacy of treatments for depressive disorders during early childhood. The yellow cluster (Adolescent Depression Manifestations), featuring 18 keywords, addresses the spectrum of affective and behavioral manifestations associated with adolescent depression. The purple cluster (Gender and Depression), containing 16 keywords, explores the gender-specific manifestations of depression in children and adolescents. The sky blue cluster (Primary Care Considerations), with 12 keywords, pertains to primary care considerations for depressive disorders in the same age groups.

Table 4 Cluster of keywords on depression in children and adolescents research field

Discussion

Adolescent depression is a prevalent mental health with diverse clinical manifestations across developmental stages [24]. Accurate diagnosis can be challenging due to factors such as misattribution of emotional fluctuations and behavioral changes to normal teenage development [25], and communication barriers that hinder adolescents from expressing their emotional distress [26, 27]. In addition to genetic factors [28], family environment [29], adverse childhood experiences [30], sleep disorders [31], and gut bacteria [32] have been proven to significantly influence the onset of depression in youth. The complexity of children and adolescent depression necessitates an interdisciplinary approach to fully understand this condition. To gain a comprehensive perspective on current research trends, we employed a bibliometric analysis of highly cited literature with significant academic impact.

Analysis of the top 100 cited articles on children and adolescent depression reveals a strong presence of research from the United States, with 79 publications (55,326 total citations), and all 11 institutions publishing four or more articles are based in the United States The most impactful original article was Kovacs’ (1985) study establishing the reliable and valid Children’s Depression Inventory (CDI-R) [22]. The most-cited review [33], by Nolen-Hoeksema and Girgus (1994), delved into gender differences in adolescent depression, highlighting the interplay of biological, psychological, and sociocultural factors, with girls exhibiting a higher susceptibility during adolescence.

The United States dominates depression research, evident in its extensive coverage of topics like childhood and adolescent depression, MDD [34], heart failure comorbid with depression [35], and electroconvulsive therapy [36]. With the development of early depression scales like the Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) by William W.K. Zung, and the presence of top institutions like the University of Pittsburgh and the University of California, the U.S. has a strong foundation for depression research. Substantial government investment further drives its depth and development. While the U.S. significantly influences global diagnostic and treatment standards, its dominance may lead to culturally incongruent standards and widen the gap in childhood depression care worldwide.

We have also found a growing trend in research from countries other than the United States in this field [37]. This suggests an increasing globalization of research efforts, with contributions from diverse nations. For example, some studies have explored the incidence of depression against the backdrop of China [38], providing valuable insights into the localized understanding of this important public health issue. At the same time, there are studies focusing on the adolescent population in Finland [39], which provide profound insights into the psychological health issues of adolescents in different cultural environments. In addition, research on the relationship between internet addiction and depression and suicidal ideation among South Korean adolescents reveals the complex interplay between technological advancement and psychological health [40], a phenomenon particularly prominent in the context of globalization.

The analyzed papers displayed a relatively even distribution across three main topics: Pathogenesis, Scales/Measurement, and Epidemiology. Notably, research on depression scales for children and adolescents, like Kovacs’ (1985, 1981) studies [19, 22], exhibited higher average rankings and citation frequencies. These findings suggest that the field prioritizes mapping the global prevalence and causes of adolescent depression, followed by methods for screening and diagnosing patients and evaluating symptom severity. Interestingly, only two of the top 100 articles specifically focused on prevention in children and adolescents [41, 42]. While early diagnosis and treatment are crucial for improving long-term outcomes [43], preventive interventions hold immense potential for population-level benefits [44]. This highlights the need for a stronger research focus on preventative strategies.

According to our co-occurrence keywords network, current research hotspots focus on understanding the pathogenesis of depression in children and adolescents (Pathogenesis of Depression cluster) and developing effective treatment methods (Treatment of MDD in Children cluster). In particular, environmental factors, temperament, and personality traits as key directions in etiological research highlight the need for early identification of risk factors [45]. Moreover, pharmacological treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD) in children, especially the application of escitalopram [46], demonstrates research interest in establishing evidence-based treatment practices. At the same time, research on early treatment (Early Childhood Treatment cluster) emphasizes the importance of intervention measures in early childhood, which may help to improve long-term prognosis [47, 48].

In addition to etiology and treatment, research on depression in children and adolescents also highlights gender-specific manifestations (Gender and Depression cluster) and adolescent-specific depressive symptoms (Adolescent Depression Manifestations cluster). These studies reveal the impact of gender and age on the expression of depressive symptoms, emphasizing the need for gender-sensitive therapeutic approaches in clinical practice [49]. Meanwhile, primary care (Primary Care Considerations cluster) plays a pivotal role in the diagnosis and management of depression in children and adolescents. Studies indicate the necessity to enhance training and resources for primary care providers to improve early recognition and intervention capabilities for depression [50].

Implications

To effectively address depression among children and adolescents, we should prioritize several key areas in clinical and practical settings. Firstly, enhancing the effectiveness of primary care is paramount. This requires investing in regular training workshops and educational materials for primary care providers, such as family doctors and pediatricians [51, 52]. For instance, a continuing education program could focus on recognizing the warning signs of depression in young patients, such as changes in mood, sleep patterns, and school performance. This enables them to recognize depressive symptoms better and offer timely interventions. Secondly, establishing robust early screening and intervention programs is crucial [53,54,55,56]. Schools can play a pivotal role in this, by implementing regular mental health screenings for students. These screenings could include self-report questionnaires and assessments by trained professionals [57, 58]. By identifying risk factors early and providing targeted support, such as counseling or referral to mental health services, we can mitigate the negative impact of depression on children and adolescents' long-term development.

Additionally, we must consider gender and age differences at a micro-level. This means tailoring therapeutic approaches to the unique needs of boys, girls, and adolescents [59, 60]. For example, girls may be more likely to express depressive symptoms through anxiety or eating disorders, while boys may manifest them through anger or aggression. Age also plays a role, as younger children may not have the vocabulary to articulate their feelings, while adolescents may be more likely to engage in risk-taking behaviors [61]. Recognizing that depressive symptoms may manifest differently across genders and age groups allows us to provide more tailored support. By incorporating these considerations into our clinical and practical work, we can create a more holistic and effective system for supporting the mental health of children.

Limitations and future directions

This study presents a bibliometric analysis of the 100 most frequently cited articles in the field of child and adolescent depression, with certain limitations acknowledged. Firstly, despite our efforts to ensure the accuracy of the research, it must be recognized that the inherent characteristics of the software algorithm have had a certain impact on the research results. Secondly, the influence of publication age on citation counts was addressed using the Average Citations per Year (ACY) score, yet this approach may have overlooked significant recent contributions. Therefore, future research should consider analyzing literature from the past five years to capture these potentially influential contributions. Finally, while we have analyzed the 100 most frequently cited articles based on citation counts, it is important to acknowledge that citation metrics are not the absolute determinant of an article’s quality. Some excellent articles from other languages and cultures may not have been included due to limited citations, primarily because their publication language restricts access to a broader research community. Future reviews should necessarily extend to high-impact articles from diverse languages and cultures.

Despite these limitations, the present study presented here reveals the trends in depression research among children and adolescents to guide other researchers in the field of depression. Moreover, the data offers valuable insights into the field and suggests that future efforts should concentrate on international collaboration, promoting early identification and intervention, and enhancing public awareness to develop and implement effective prevention strategies and interventions. Furthermore, based on the analysis of research hotspots, it is recommended that future studies focus on refining and enhancing early identification mechanisms, developing more sensitive screening tools, devising early intervention plans, and evaluating the efficacy of various intervention methods across diverse patient populations to achieve superior therapeutic outcomes.

Conclusions

In conclusion, this is the first bibliometric study to identify the 100 most cited papers on depression in children and adolescents. Our results reveal research hotspots, key research directions, the evolutionary process, productive authors, productive countries, and institutions focusing on depression in the past 40 years. Keyword network analysis points to 'major depression,' 'childhood,' 'symptoms,' and 'psychiatric disorders' as key areas of current discussion and future research, suggesting an evolving research focus from epidemiology and scale validation to deeper explorations of pathogenesis.

Overall, the United States dominates in terms of publications, researchers, and institutions. JAMA Psychiatry is the most frequent publication of these highly significant papers between 1981 and 2021. While studies related to Pathogenesis, Scales/Measurement, and Epidemiology have garnered considerable academic attention, especially in the area of Scales/Measurement, there is a noted gap in focus on prevention. Given the increasing prevalence of depression among young populations, this highlights the urgent need to develop and refine early screening and intervention programs that are sensitive to gender and age differences, which have been less emphasized in the research field.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article and its additional file.

References

  1. Lu W. Adolescent depression: national trends, risk factors, and healthcare disparities. Am J Health Behav. 2019;43(1):181–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gotlib IH, Joormann J. Cognition and depression: current status and future directions. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2010;6:285–312.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Muyiduli X, Zhang R, Zhang J, Zhe W, Dong Y, Wang W, et al. Prevalence and relevant factors of depression among adolescents in Xinjiang, China: a cross-sectional survey. Medicine (Baltimore). 2024;103(7): e37090.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lisiecka-Biełanowicz M, Biechowska D, Orłowska E, Molenda B. The prevalence of depression in children and adolescents under 18 years of age treated for mental disorders in Poland between 2005 and 2016. Arch Med Sci AMS. 2023;19(2):371–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee EJ, Kim SJ. Prevalence and related factors of depression before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: findings from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. J Korean Med Sci. 2023;38(10): e74.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang X, Yan Y, Ye Z, Xie J. Descriptive analysis of depression among adolescents in Huangshi, China. BMC Psychiatry. 2023;23(1):176.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Johar M, Truong J. Direct and indirect effect of depression in adolescence on adult wages. Appl Econ. 2014;46(36):4431–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Vaananen JM, Frojd S, Ranta K, Marttunen M, Helminen M, Kaltiala-Heino R. Relationship between social phobia and depression differs between boys and girls in mid-adolescence. J Affect Disord. 2011;133(1–2):97–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kenny B, Bowe SJ, Taylor CB, Moodie M, Brown V, Hoban E, et al. Longitudinal relationships between sub-clinical depression, sub-clinical eating disorders and health-related quality of life in early adolescence. Int J Eat Disord. 2023;56(6):1114–24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Glied S, Pine DS. Consequences and correlates of adolescent depression. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002;156(10):1009–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cuijpers P, Smit F. Excess mortality in depression: a meta-analysis of community studies. J Affect Disord. 2002;72(3):227–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhou M, Bian B, Zhu W. A half century of research on childhood and adolescent depression: science mapping the literature, 1970 to 2019. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(18):9524.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Bertha EA, Balázs J. Subthreshold depression in adolescence: a systematic review. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2013;22(10):589–603.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Donthu N, Kumar S, Mukherjee D, Pandey N, Lim WM. How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. J Bus Res. 2021;133:285–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Colavizza G, Hrynaszkiewicz I, Staden I, Whitaker K, McGillivray B. The citation advantage of linking publications to research data. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(4): e0230416.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Thelwall M. Bibliometrics to webometrics. J Inf Sci. 2008;34(4):605–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ding X, Yang Z. Knowledge mapping of platform research: a visual analysis using VOSviewer and CiteSpace. Electron Commer Res. 2022;22(3):787–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang L, Hou Y, Sun J, Zeng Y. The top 100 most cited articles in the last two decades of atopic dermatitis: a bibliometric analysis. Front Immunol. 2022;13: 949665.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Kovacs M. Rating-scales to assess depression in school-aged children. ACTA Paedopsychiatr. 1981;46(5–6):305–15.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Birleson P. the validity of depressive disorder in childhood and the development of a self-rating scale - a research report. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1981;22(1):73–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Racine N, McArthur BA, Cooke JE, Eirich R, Zhu J, Madigan S. Global prevalence of depressive and anxiety symptoms in children and adolescents during COVID-19. a meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr. 2021;175(11):1142–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kovacs M. The childrens depression, inventory (cdi). Psychopharmacol Bull. 1985;21(4):995–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Clarke GN, Hornbrook M, Lynch F, Polen M, Gale J, Beardslee W, et al. A randomized trial of a group cognitive intervention for preventing depression in adolescent offspring of depressed parents. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001;58(12):1127–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jiang X, Zheng H, Yang R, Wang S, Zhong H. Retrospective analysis of clinical characteristics and treatment of children and adolescents with depression. Front Psychiatry. 2023;27:14.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Madigan S, Racine N, Vaillancourt T, Korczak DJ, Hewitt JMA, Pador P, et al. Changes in depression and anxiety among children and adolescents from before to during the COVID-19 pandemic a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr. 2023;177(6):567–81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Flouri E, Panourgia C. Negative automatic thoughts and emotional and behavioural problems in adolescence. Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2014;19(1):46–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Huang X-C, Zhang Y-N, Xiao-yu W, Jiang Y, Cai H, Deng Y, qian, et al. A cross-sectional study: family communication, anxiety, and depression in adolescents: the mediating role of family violence and problematic internet use. BMC Public Health. 2023;23(1):1747.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Rice F. The genetics of depression in childhood and adolescence. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2009;11(2):167–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Scheer SD, Unger DG. Russian adolescents in the era of emergent democracy: the role of family environment in substance use and depression. Fam Relat. 1998;47(3):297–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lee RY, Oxford ML, Sonney J, Enquobahrie DA, Cato KD. The mediating role of anxiety/depression symptoms between adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and somatic symptoms in adolescents. J Adolesc. 2022;94(2):133–47.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Yuan W, Chen L, Wu Y, Su B, Liu J, Zhang Y, et al. Sleep time and quality associated with depression and social anxiety among children and adolescents aged 6–18 years, stratified by body composition. J Affect Disord. 2023;1(338):321–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hao S-R, Zhang Z, Zhou Y-Y, Zhang X, Sun W-J, Yang Zi, et al. Altered gut bacterial-fungal interkingdom networks in children and adolescents with depression. J Affect Disord. 2023;332:64–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Nolen-Hoeksema S, Girgus JS. The emergence of gender differences in depression during adolescence. Psychol Bull. 1994;115(3):424–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Chen P, Feng Y, Li XH, Li JX, Wang YY, Zheng WY, et al. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on major depressive disorder: a bibliometric perspective. Front Psychiatry. 2023. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1136125/full.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Ying H, Zhang X, He T, Feng Q, Wang R, Yang L, et al. A bibliometric analysis of research on heart failure comorbid with depression from 2002 to 2021. Heliyon. 2023;9(2): e13054.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Cai H, Du R, Yang K, Li W, Wang Z. Association between electroconvulsive therapy and depressive disorder from 2012 to 2021: Bibliometric analysis and global trends. Front Hum Neurosci. 2022;15(16):1044917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Xu D, Wang YL, Wang KT, Wang Y, Dong XR, Tang J, et al. A scientometrics analysis and visualization of depressive disorder. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2021;19(6):766–86.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Duan L, Shao X, Wang Y, Huang Y, Miao J, Yang X, et al. An investigation of mental health status of children and adolescents in china during the outbreak of COVID-19. J Affect Disord. 2020;1(275):112–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kaltiala-Heino R, Rimpelä M, Marttunen M, Rimpelä A, Rantanen P. Bullying, depression, and suicidal ideation in Finnish adolescents: school survey. BMJ. 1999;319(7206):348–51.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Kim K, Ryu E, Chon MY, Yeun EJ, Choi SY, Seo JS, et al. Internet addiction in Korean adolescents and its relation to depression and suicidal ideation: a questionnaire survey. Int J Nurs Stud. 2006;43(2):185–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Clarke G, Hawkins W, Murphy M, Sheeber L, Lewinsohn P, Seeley J. Targeted prevention of unipolar depressive disorder in an at-risk sample of high-school adolescents - a randomized trial of group cognitive intervention. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1995;34(3):312–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Horowitz JL, Garber J. The prevention of depressive symptoms in children and adolescents: a meta-analytic review. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2006;74(3):401–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Zwolinska W, Dmitrzak-Weglarz M, Slopien A. Biomarkers in child and adolescent depression. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2023;54(1):266–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Monshouwer K, Smit F, Ruiter M, Ormel H, Verhulst F, Vollebergh W, et al. Identifying target groups for the prevention of depression in early adolescence: The TRAILS study. J Affect Disord. 2012;138(3):287–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Zhou K, Chen J, Huang C, Tang S. Prevalence of and factors influencing depression and anxiety among Chinese adolescents: a protocol for a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2023;13(3): e068119.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Saito T, Takahashi H, Tsujii N, Sasaki T, Yamaguchi Y, Takatsu M, et al. Efficacy of preventing relapse evaluated by a multicenter randomized double-blind placebo-controlled withdrawal study of escitalopram in Japanese adolescents with major depressive disorder. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2023;33(10):418–27.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Membride H. Mental health: early intervention and prevention in children and young people. Br J Nurs Mark Allen Publ. 2016;25(10):552-4–556-7.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Honeyman C. Recognising mental health problems in children and young people. Paediatr Nurs. 2007;19(8):38–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Sun Y, Zhong Y, Sun W, Chu L, Long J, Fan XW. More prevalent and more severe: gender differences of depressive symptoms in Chinese adolescents. Front PUBLIC Health. 2023;13(11):1167234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Beck A, Dryburgh N, Bennett A, Shaver N, Esmaeilisaraji L, Skidmore B, et al. Screening for depression in children and adolescents in primary care or non-mental health settings: a systematic review update. Syst Rev. 2024;13:1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Farley AM, Gallop RJ, Brooks ES, Gerdes M, Bush ML, Young JF. Identification and management of adolescent depression in a large pediatric care network. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2020;41(2):85–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Reinauer C, Platzbecker AL, Viermann R, Domhardt M, Baumeister H, Foertsch K, et al. Efficacy of motivational interviewing to improve utilization of mental health services among youths with chronic medical conditions a cluster randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw OPEN. 2021;4(10): e2127622.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Grano N, Karjalainen M, Edlund V, Saari E, Itkonen A, Anto J, et al. Changes in depression, anxiety and hopelessness symptoms during family- and community-oriented intervention for help-seeking adolescents and adolescents at risk of psychosis. Nord J PSYCHIATRY. 2014;68(2):93–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Cuijpers P, van Straten A, Smits N, Smit F. Screening and early psychological intervention for depression in schools. Eur CHILD Adolesc PSYCHIATRY. 2006;15(5):300–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. van Lang NDJ, Ferdinand RF, Verhulst FC. Predictors of future depression in early and late adolescence. J Affect Disord. 2007;97(1–3):137–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Dhamayanti M, Noviandhari A, Masdiani N, Pandia V, Sekarwana N. The association of depression with child abuse among Indonesian adolescents. BMC Pediatr. 2020;20(1):1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Allison VL, Nativio DG, Mitchell AM, Ren D, Yuhasz J. Identifying symptoms of depression and anxiety in students in the school setting. J Sch Nurs. 2014;30(3):165–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Braund TA, Baker STE, Subotic-Kerry M, Tillman G, Evans NJ, Mackinnon A, et al. Potential mental health-related harms associated with the universal screening of anxiety and depressive symptoms in Australian secondary schools. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2024;18(1):46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Quintana-Orts C, Rey L. Forgiveness, depression, and suicidal behavior in adolescents: gender differences in this relationship. J Genet Psychol. 2018;179(2):85–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Jenkins JH, Sanchez G, Miller EA, Allande NIS, Urano G, Pryor AJ. Depression and anxiety among multiethnic middle school students: Age, gender, and sociocultural environment. Int J Soc PSYCHIATRY. 2023;69(3):784–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Lagges AM, Dunn DW. Depression in children and adolescents. Neurol Clin. 2003;21(4):953.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are very grateful to the editors and reviewers for their dedication to our manuscript.

Funding

This work is financially supported by the National Social Science Foundation of China (Grant Number 20BSH096) to ZW.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

FY Mei contributed to conceptualize, design, data collecting and analyzing, and writing of manuscript. ZD Wang contributed to conceptualize the study, supervise the project, and writing, and review of manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhidan Wang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mei, F., Wang, Z. Trends in Mental Health: A Review of the Most Influential Research on Depression in Children and Adolescents. Ann Gen Psychiatry 23, 36 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12991-024-00520-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12991-024-00520-2

Keywords