Skip to main content
  • Primary research
  • Open access
  • Published:

Endocannabinergic modulation of central serotonergic activity in healthy human volunteers



The serotonergic and the endocannabinoid system are involved in the etiology of depression. Depressive patients exhibit low serotonergic activity and decreased level of the endocannabinoids anandamide (AEA) and 2-arachidonylglycerol (2AG). Since the cannabinoid (CB) 1 receptor is activated by endogenous ligands such as AEA and 2AG, whose concentration are controlled by the fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) and monoacylglycerol lipase, respectively, we investigated the effects on serotonergic utilization. In this study, we investigated the impact of the rs1049353 single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) of the cannabinoid receptor 1 (CNR1) gene, which codes the endocannabinoid CB1 receptor, and the rs324420 SNP of the FAAH gene on the serotonergic and endocannabinoid system in 59 healthy volunteers.


Serotonergic activity was measured by loudness dependence of auditory-evoked potentials (LDAEP). Plasma concentrations of AEA, 2AG and its inactive isomer 1AG were determined by mass spectrometry. Genotyping of two SNPs (rs1049353, rs344420) was conducted by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and differential enzymatic analysis with the PCR restriction fragment length polymorphism method.


Genotype distributions by serotonergic activity or endocannabinoid concentration showed no differences. However, after detailed consideration of the CNR1-A-allele-carriers, a reduced AEA (A-allele-carrier M = 0.66, SD = 0.24; GG genotype M = 0.72, SD = 0.24) and 2AG (A-allele-carriers M = 0.70, SD = 0.33; GG genotype M = 1.03, SD = 0.83) plasma concentration and an association between the serotonergic activity and the concentrations of AEA and 2AG has been observed.


Our results suggest that carriers of the CNR1-A allele may be more susceptible to developing depression.


Major depression is among the most common and in terms of its severity the most underestimated disease. The fact, that the disease impacts the well-being and the quality of life, thus causing a high psychological strain [30]. Major depression is characterized by mental dejectedness as lead symptom and shows cyclic courses. Further symptoms can be detected in the emotional, motivating, cognitive and neuro-vegetative area and in the psychomotor activity [2]. The manifestation of the disease varies while the symptomatology shows a common characteristic [42]. Depressive diseases are heterogeneous illnesses, which can be traced back on the interaction of multiple genes with environment factors such as stress [10, 35, 31].

Disorders of the serontonergic system are being discussed as pathogenetic factors for the emergence and characteristic of psychiatric diseases such as depression [48]. In the pharmacological treatment of depression, the serotonergic system has proven to be an effective point of action for therapy [9]. The monoamine hypothesis of depression is the most popular theory, it states that a reduced monoaminerge transmission within the central nervous system is the reason for depression [52]. The successful application of serotonin and noradrenalin-based antidepressants like selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) confirms this hypothesis [51]. The defective regulations of the serotonin balance during a depression phase are found in different parts of the serotonergic system [38, 53].

The endocannabinoid system plays an important role in the modulation of the serotonergic system [29]. There are two cannabinoid (CB) receptors (CB1 and CB2) in the endocannabinoid system, whose natural ligands and specific enzymes are responsible for their biosynthesis and metabolic inactivation. It has been shown that the endocannabinoid system is involved in the pathophysiology of depression [25, 54, 57]. The CB1-receptor is a G-protein-coupled receptor, which is expressed in the central nervous system [19] and plays a role in the serotonergic neurotransmission [4, 20]. Five endocannabinoids exists, whereof Anandamid (AEA) and 2-Arachidonoylglycerol (2AG) are the most potent substances. Endocannabinoids can be considered as neuromodulators at the CB1 receptor [14].

Several genetic studies show that there is an interaction between the CB1 receptor gene (CNR1), the serotonin receptor gene (SERT) and the anxiety disorder [37]. Several experimental examinations in humans reveal a significant association between the functional (AAT)n-polymorphism within the CNR1 gene and depression by patients with Parkinson’s disease [6]. It is, however, assumed that a changed CNR1 expression plays an important role for the pathogenesis of depression [57]. A lower CB1 receptor density has been found in the cortex of patients with major depression [36]. The CNR 1 rs1049353 A allele exhibits an increased risk for developing a depression particularly in haplotypic combination [34]. The effect of variation within the CNR1 gene for depression have been shown [43]. Furthermore, the CNR1 gene is negatively regulated by glucocorticoids. Hypercortisolemia is present in depressed patients, so this supports the hypothesis that there is decreased activity of the endocannabinoid system in these patients [39]. The CNR1 polymorphism studied, rs 1049353, could influence CNR1 receptor functions by affecting translation or mRNA stability [11].

The CB-1 receptor is activated by endogenous ligands such as AEA and 2AG. The hydrolytic enzymes Fatty Acid Amide Hydrolase (FAAH) and monoacylglycerol lipase (MAGL) are responsible for the metabolism of AEA and 2AG [12, 16]. In animal studies, CB1 receptor antagonist, endogenous cannabinoid reuptake inhibitor or inhibitor of FAAH enzymes generate an antidepressive effect [1, 20, 25]. The direct activation of central CB1 shows in animal models of depression (e.g. forced swim test, tail suspension test) a significant antidepressive effect [5, 20, 25, 56]. By analogy, depressive patients show a reduced 2AG-concentration in serum, whereby the concentration is negatively correlated with the duration of depression [28]. Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the rs324420FAAH genes lead to be relevant and have an impact on brain biochemistry, neurocircuitry, behavior and symptoms [15]. Moreover, this polymorphism reduces FAAH activity, resulting in increased anandamide serum concentrations [55].

Loudness dependence of auditory evoked potentials (LDAEP) is an established measure for the central serotonin-system activity [24, 33, 60]. A low LDAEP is implied by a high serotonergic neurotransmission [32]. A significant correlation in depressive patients is shown between the increased stimulus intensity of LDEAP measured with low serotonergic function and successful response on SSRIs [23, 32, 47]. Alterations in serotonin neurotransmission may increase the risk of psychiatric disorders, so “Loudness dependence of auditory evoked potentials” (LDAEP)—a non-invasive method may be applied to measure its activity. Preclinical and animal studies have shown that LDAEP is an indicator for serotonergic neurotransmission/activity in the brain [24, 33, 49, 60].

The aim of the present study was to investigate possible associations between the endogenous cannabinoid system and the central serotonergic activity in healthy volunteers. Central serotonergic transmission is determined indirectly by the loudness dependence of auditory evoked potentials. For this, we determine the distribution and effect of SNPs within the CNR1 gene and the FAAH gene and endocannabinoids concentration (AEA, 2AG) and the serotonergic activity.

Here, we hypothesize that CNR 1 rs1049353 A carriers and in the presence of SNPs in rs324420FAAH genes a reduced AEA and 2AG concentration in plasma is present. In addition, we suspect reduced serotonergic activity in the presence of these.


Study population

The sample contained 59 healthy probands (31 females and 28 males, average age 28.47 ± 7.62 years). The test persons were right handed, normal hearing and non-smokers. Neither at the time of the survey nor in their health history they suffered from psychiatric diseases or acute, severe and unstable somatic illnesses. In their past, there was no substance abuse and no regular use of medicines. No psychiatric diseases of first degree relatives existed and there was also no low intelligence or suicidality. The investigation of psychometry was done by the following tests: Multiple Choice Word Test (MWT-B), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-21), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) und Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS). Thereby, no psychiatric disorders were emerged. The mean score and the ranges of the psychometry are listed in the following: MWT-B 114.9 (90–129), HAMD-21 0.6 (0–4), BDI 1.54 (0–10), STAI 29.8 (20–58) and BPRS 18.1 (18–21).

LDAEP measurement

To determine the central serotonin-system activity, the Loudness dependence of auditory evoked potentials (LDAEP) method was executed in a noise reduced and electrically shielded room adjacent to the measurement equipment. This was done via the subject´s eyes open using the Brain Vision BrainAmp ® MR method (Brain Products GmbH, Munich, Germany). The test persons sat in a slightly lying position on a chair with a headrest.

For the EEG acquisition, 32 non-polarized silver–silver chloride electrodes were attached to a suitable EEG cap (Easy Cap®) according to the 10/20 system (impedance ≤ 10 kΩ). The acoustic stimulation contained five stimulations with an inter-stimulus interval randomized between 1800 and 2200 ms. Tone bursts of 1000 Hz (Hertz) with a duration of 40 ms (milliseconds) (rise-/fade-time 10 ms) were presented to the test persons in 5 intensities (60, 70. 80, 90, 100 dB SPL) via headphones. The stimuli were created with E-Prime Software (Presentation 11.3® Neurobehavioral Systems Inc. Albany, CA, USA). The eye movement is captured by an electrode, which is placed 1 cm below the outside left corner of the eye. The impedance was kept below of 5 kΩ (kilo ohms). The EEG was recorded with a sampling rate of 256 Hz and an analogue bandpass filter (0, 16–70 Hz). At least 40 artifact-free trials per intensity were included in the further analysis (Brain Products GmbH, Munich, Germany). A semi-automatic measurement at the Cz (central zero) electrode was carried out at peaks of N1 (60–125 ms) and P2 (110–210 ms). The N1/P2 (negativ/positiv) amplitude was defined as the difference in the peak amplitude between N1 and N2. The calculation of LDAEP was executed by means of the least square linear regression slope, while the stimulus intensity was considered as the independent variable and the N1/P2 amplitude was considered as the dependent variable.

Genotyping SNPs

DNA of the participants was extracted from EDTA (ethylendiaminotetraacetat)-anticoagulated peripheral blood by using a QIAamp DNA mini Kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany) under the protocol of Qiagen. SNPs were chosen for genotyping by selecting SNPs from the literature (CNR1 rs1049353, FAAH rs324420). Genotyping/allel determination was conducted by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and differential enzymatic analysis with the PCR restriction fragment length polymorphism method. Oligonucleotides were designed using Primer Express 2.0 Software (Applied Biosystems).

Endocannabinoid measurements

Endocannabinoid measurements were performed at the Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Hannover Medical School, Germany. Measurements were carried out on an ultra-performance liquid chromatograph model ACQUITY coupled with a tandem mass spectrometer (UPLC-MS/MS) model XEVO TQ MS (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) as reported elsewhere [61, 62]. We determined simultaneously the plasma concentration of AEA, 2AG and 1AG. Venous blood was collected early in the morning from subjects, who has fasted (not had anything to eat or drink) about 8 h. Venous blood samples were taken and drawn into EDTA-containing tubes (BD Vacutainer, Franklin Lakes, NY, USA) and centrifuged at 3500 rpm (rounds per minute). The time interval between blood sampling and centrifugation was kept below 10 min. Plasma aliquots were stored at − 80 °C until assay. The stored samples were thawed on ice and 300-µL aliquots thereof were spiked with a mixture of deuterated (d) analogs in ethanol, i.e., d4-AEA and d5-2AG, to reach a final concentration of 2.5 nM each. d4-AEA and d5-2AG, served as internal standards for AEA and 2AG, respectively. Then, plasma samples were incubated for 15 min on ice. Extraction was conducted by adding 1 mL toluene to each sample and by shaking twice in a Precellys®24 Dual homogenizer at 5000 rpm for 20 s with interruption of 5 s, so that the warming of the samples was prevented. The phase separation was carried out by centrifugation (4655×g, 4 °C, 5 min). The upper organic phase was transferred into a 1.5-mL glass vial. After solvent evaporation under a nitrogen stream, the residue was dried at room temperature (25 °C) under nitrogen. The residues were reconstituted in 40 µL of water–methanol (1:3, v/v) and mixed by vortexing for 10 s, and 10-µL aliquots were injected. Quantitative analyses were performed in positive electrospray ionization and selected–reaction monitoring modes as described previously [62].

Statistical analysis

Pearson correlation analysis was used to determine the correlation of the whole sample and the eCS (endocannabinoids) concentration and the LDAEP value. For genotypes and alleles specific association with eCS concentration one-way ANOVA and t-Tests was conducted. SPSS Ver.21.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc.) was used for all statistical analysis. Data are reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD). p values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.


Healthy volunteers did not differ in age and an equal distribution existed for gender. The mean of the years of education was 16.56 ± 2.50. The mean score of the alcohol use was 2.6 drinks per week in a range of 0–15. Genotype and alleles distribution are displayed in Table 1. No psychiatric disorders were recorded. The central serotonergic activity, measured by LDAEP had a mean value of 0.252 ± 0.15. The consideration of the alleles distribution in matters of LDEAP showed, that the healthy volunteers with homozygous G (guanine) alleles of the rs 1049353CNR1 gene in mean was a trend towards lower LDEAP score than the A (adenosine) allele carriers (0.233 ± 0.121 vs. 0.277 ± 0.169, p = 0.173). In case of the alleles allocation for the rs 324420FAAH gene, the homozygous C (cytosine) allele carriers displayed in mean a nearly identical LDAEP score than the A-allele-carriers (0.255 ± 0.161 vs. 0.243 ± 0.114) (Table 1).

Table 1 Genotype and allele distribution of the rs 1049353CNR1 and rs 324420FAAH variations in healthy volunteers and mean and standard deviation of LDAEP score and concentration of the endocannabinoids (AEA, 2AG and totalAG) for the genotype and allele distribution

The plasma concentration was 0.67 ± 0.22 nmol/L for AEA, 0.82 ± 0.59 nmol/L for 2AG, and 2.13 ± 2.14 nmol/L for total AG, i.e., 2AG + 1AG (Table 1). Looking closer into the data of alleles distribution of the endocannabinoid concentration revealed that homozygous C allele carriers for the rs 324420FAAH gene displayed lower concentrations of the analysed endocannabinoids than the A-allele-carriers (AEA: 0.64 ± 0.21 nmol/L vs. 0.76 ± 0.22 nmol/L, p = 0.076; 2AG: 0.76 ± 0.46 nmol/L vs. 2AG: 0.99 ± 0.87 nmol/L, p = 0.199; total AG 2.01 ± 1.62 nmol/L vs. 2.50 ± 3.27 nmol/L, p = 0.452) (Table 1). There were no statistical differences detected when comparing genotype and allele frequencies related to the mean score of plasma endocannabinoid concentrations.

Group comparison of the LDAEP scores to evaluate the effects of the genotypes and alleles distribution of the focused genes the rs 1049353CNR1 und rs 324420FAAH showed no statistical significances.

Group comparison by t test of homozygous GG carriers and A carrier of the rs 1049353CNR1 gene revealed a significant association of the CNR1 and the 2-AG concentration (t = 2.352, df = 56, p = 0.022; Fig. 1), as well as of CNR1 and total AG concentration (t = 2.500, df = 56, p = 0.015, Fig. 2) evident.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Plasma level comparison of the endocannabinoid 2AG between the A-allele carriers and the GG carriers of the rs 1049353CNR1 variation (*p < 0.005, significant one-way ANOVA)

Fig. 2
figure 2

Plasma level comparison of the endocannabinoid total AG between the A-allele-carriers and the GG carriers of the rs 1049353CNR1 variation. (*p < 0.005, significant one-way ANOVA)

Correlation analysis of the whole population were calculated by Pearson, they detected no significant correlation between the LDAEP value and the concentration of the reviewed endocannabinoids (AEA, 2AG and total AG).

The t test of LDAEP scores to evaluate the effects of the genotypes and alleles distribution of the focused genes rs 1049353CNR1 und rs 324420FAAH show no significances as well.

There was a tendency toward a negative for the subgroup of A-allele-carrier of rs 1049353CNR1 gene in reference to the LDAEP value and the endocannabinoid AEA (r = − 0.185, p = 0.156). But the effect is not significant. In addition, for this subgroup, there was a trend toward negative correlation in terms of LDEAP values and the concentration of the endocannabinoid 2AG (r = − 0.234, p = 0.099).


The interaction between components of the endocannabinoid system and central serotonergic transmission in healthy volunteers was the basis of our studies, which examined, peripheral serum concentrations of the endocannabinoids 2-AG and anandamide and a single-nucleotide polymorphism of each of the CNR1 gene (rs1049353) and the FAAH gene (rs324420) and, LDAEP as an indirect measure of central serotonergic transmission.

The genetic aspects of polymorphism of central receptors or enzymes of the endocannabinoid system were of particular importance for the understanding of the processes. Delineating the underlying mechanisms improves our knowledge of depression and may contribute to better treat this disease. The present analysis investigating rs 1049353CNR1 and rs 324420FAAH gene SNP variants in healthy volunteers. In about half of the healthy subjects, a homozygous G allele was present in the rs 1049353CNR1 SNP studied. Whereas Monteleone et al. [44] displayed a three-quarter share in homozygous GG genotype of CNR1 gene in healthy controls. The difference of the distribution could be caused by the sample size. On the other hand, FAAH genotype distribution was nearly the same in both studies.

Evidence for the role of endocannabinoid signalling in the regulation of the serotonin system is suggested by behavioural studies showing a high level of functional overlap between the serotonin and the endocannabinoid system [40, 41, 46, 59].

Looking at the genotypes and alleles distribution of the SNPS rs 324420FAAH genes and rs 1049353CNR1 in healthy volunteers of our study, no statistical differences were detected with respect to serotonergic activity. Nevertheless, Dlugos et al. [17] showed a genetic variation of rs 324420FAAH is associated with specific mood responses, whereas clinical studies displayed that genetic variability of the CNR1 gene predicts an effect to etiology of major depression and clinical response [43]. Different results between our and the groups are likely to be due to differences in the study populations, for instance, patients versus healthy volunteers in our study.

With regard to the genotypes distribution of rs 1049353CNR1 and rs 324420FAAH genes in our study and the focus on the plasma concentration of AEA, 2AG and total AG, there were also no differences displayed in healthy volunteers. This also applies to the allele distribution of the FAAH gene. Whereas Chiang et al. [11] have shown that polymorphism in rs 324420FAAH determine in approximately half of the enzymatic activity of FAAH in humans, so that an increased activation of AEA and 2AG is triggered. As a consequence, the concentration of the investigated endocannabinoids had to be reduced. These results were also replicated in further investigations [15, 55]. In our study, we did not find higher AEA plasma concentrations suggesting that FAAH activity is not diminished in the healthy volunteers of our study. Following this line of investigation in animal models, a reduction of FAAH activity results in the increase level of endogenous cannabinoids AEA and 2AG, so an inhibition of the FAAH enzyme has antidepressant effect [20]. The CNR 1-A-allele exhibits an increased risk for developing a depression particularly in haplotypic combination [34]. A closer analysis of the allele distribution of the CNR1 gene, particularly the A-allele-carriers and the homozygous G-allele-carriers distribution, appears to show an association of the haplotype and the concentrations of the endocannabinoids AEA and 2AG. The measurement of the endocannabinoid concentrations in A-allele-carriers showed a lower concentration than in the homozygous G-allele-carriers. This is evident in various studies. Umathe et al. [56] showed an interaction between endocannabinoids (AEA, 2AG) and the serotonergic system in the regulation of depressive and compulsive behaviour. Reduced AEA and 2AG concentrations are determined in patients with major depression [26,27,28]. This means that a modification of the central endocannabinoid system caused a variation in major depression. Data of animal studies had already shown that regulation of either CB1 receptor antagonist, endogenous cannabinoid reuptake inhibitor or inhibitor of FAAH enzymes have generated an antidepressive effect [1, 20], [25]. The direct activation of central CB1 receptors with exogenous applied synthetic CB1-receptor agonists (e.g. HU210, WIN55, 212-2), by indirect activation of central CB1-receptor with selective FAAH inhibitors (e.g. URB597) or inhibitors of the membrane anandamid-transporter-receptor (e.g. AM404) showed in animal models of depression (e.g. forced swim test, tail suspension test) a significant antidepressive effect [20, 56, 25]. By administration of selective CB1-receptor antagonists (e.g. AM251, SR141716) nearby a CB1-receptor-mediated mechanism, a blocking of the effect is shown. By analogy, depressive patients show a reduced 2AG concentration in serum, whereby the concentration is negatively correlated with the duration of depression [28].

Further analysis of the FAAH-A-allele-carrier in terms of the dependency of the serotonergic activity and the plasma concentration of the investigated endocannabinoids indicated no interactions. Indeed, the same consideration of the subgroup of CNR1-A-allel-carriers showed specific coherencies. In this sense, it has been indicated that lower concentrations of the endocannabinoid AEA and 2AG came along with lower LDAEP score. These results point towards an influence of the CNR1 genetic variation on the endocannabinoid concentrations and the serotonergic activity. Considering that CNR1-A-allele carriers have an increased risk to predict a major depression these results are accompanied with the findings of other studies that endocannabinoid concentrations were decreased in major depression [26,27,28].

Our findings were reinforced by the results in clinical studies. These studies showed an interaction between the endocannabinoid system and depression. The THC-analogue Dronabinol® showed antidepressive effects [8], while the selective CB1-receptor-antagonist SR141716 tended to result in depressive symptoms [13, 45]. The functional interaction of the serotonergic and endocannabinoid system in brain plays a potential role of CB1 receptor signal in psychiatric disease like depression [18]. The interplay of cannabidiol and endocannabinoids [7] promote the activation of 5-HT1A receptors [50], so a possible connection of the endocannabinoid system and the serotonergic system in case of depression is supposable. There is evidence that increased endocannabinoid concentration and the stimulation of CB1 receptors reduce stress responses and anxiolytic effects [3, 21]. The fact that glucocorticoids modulate the excitability of 5-HT neurons results in an increased concentration of endocannabinoids. This gave an indication for a potential cellular mechanism, which is involved in the regulation of stress related behaviour [58]. Meanwhile, it is also known that the CB1 receptors are located on serotonergic neurons of the raphe nuclei. This implies that the endocannabinoid System modulates serotonergic functions [22]. These clinical results and our assumption indicate a relation between the serotonergic system and the endocannabinoid system in depression.

There are some limitations of the study. The small size of the genetic sample limits the power to detect small differences. Furthermore, the investigation comprised only one SNP of CNR1 and FAAH genes, there are many more applicable SNP within these genes. Due to the limited sample size, it was not possible to assess the differences that might exist between heterozygosity GA and homozygosity AA. Further limitation is the involvement of healthy volunteers. Extension of our conclusions to the major depression requires further studies on patients.


In conclusion, our study shows no differences in serotonergic activity and plasma endocannabinoid concentration with respect to the genotype distribution of CNR1 and FAAH genes in healthy subjects. Finally, these results show that healthy subjects who are carriers of the CNR1-A allele have lower endocannabinoid concentrations than patients with major depression. Our results suggest that carriers of the CNR1-A allele may be more susceptible to the development of depression. In addition, an interaction between endocannabinoid concentration and the serotonergic system was demonstrated.

Availability of data and materials

Raw data were generated at LWL-University Hospital Bochum. Derived data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author [B.E.] on request.







Serotonin transporter








Silver chloride


Beck Depression Inventory


Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale






Cannabinoid receptor 1


Central zero








Fatty acid amide hydrolase


Frontal central zero




Hamilton Depression Rating Scale




Kilo ohms


Loudness dependence of auditory evoked potentials


Monoacylglycerol lipase






Multiple Choice Word Test






Polymerase chain reaction


Rounds per minute


Serotonin receptor gene


Single-nucleotide polymorphism


State-Trait Anxiety Inventory


Tandem mass spectrometer


  1. Adamczyk P, Gołda A, McCreary AC, Filip M, Przegaliński E. Activation of endocannabinoid transmission induces antidepressant-like effects in rats. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2008;59:217–28.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed. text revision). Washington: American Psychiatric Association; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Arévalo C, de Miguel R, Hernández-Tristán R. Cannabinoid effects on anxiety-related behaviours and hypothalamic neurotransmitters. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2001;70:123–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bambico FR, Katz N, Debonnel G, Gobbi G. Cannabinoids elicit antidepressant-like behavior and activate serotonergic neurons through the medial prefrontal cortex. J Neurosci. 2007;27:11700–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Bambico FR, Duranti A, Nobrega JN, Gobbi G. The fatty acid amide hydrolase inhibitor URB597 modulates serotonin-dependent emotional behaviour, and serotonin1A and serotonin2A/C activity in the hippocampus. Eur Neuropsychopharmacology. 2016;26(3):578-90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Barrero FJ, Ampuero I, Morales B, Vives F, de Dios Luna del Castillo J, Hoenicka J, Garcia Yebenes J. Depression in Parkinson’s disease is related to a genetic polymorphism of the cannabinoid receptor gene (CNR1). Pharmacogenomics J. 2005;5:135–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bisogno T, Hanus L, De Petrocellis L, Tchilibon S, Ponde DE, Brandi I, Moriello AS, Davis JB, Mechoulam R, Di Marzo V. Molecular targets for cannabidiol and its synthetic analogues: effect on vanilloid VR1 receptors and on the cellular uptake and enzymatic hydrolysis of anandamide. Br J Pharmacol. 2001;134:845–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Blass K. Treating depression with cannabinoids. Cannabinoids. 2008;3:8–10.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Blier P, de Montigny C. Serotonin and drug-induced therapeutic responses in major depression, obsessive-compulsive and panic disorders. Neuropsychopharmacology. 1999;21:91S-98S.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Caspi A, Sugden K, Moffitt TE, Taylor A, Craig I, Harrington HL, McClay J, Mill J, Martin J, Poulton R. Influence of life stress on depression: moderation by a polymorphism in the 5-HTT gene. Science. 2003;301(5631):386–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chiang KP, Gerber AL, Sipe JC, Cravatt BF. Reduced cellular expression and activity of the P129T mutant of human fatty acid amide hydrolase: evidence for a link between defects in the endocannabinoid system and problem drug use. Hum Mol Genet. 2004;13:2113–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cravatt BF, Giang DK, Mayfield SP, Boger DL, Lerner RA, Gilula NB. Molecular characterization of an enzyme that degrades neuromodulatory fatty-acid amides. Nature. 1996;384:83–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Despres JP, Golay A, Sjöström L. Effects of rimonabant on metabolic risk factors in overweight patients with dyslipidemia. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:2121–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Devane WA, Breuer A, Sheskin T, Järbe TU, Eisen MS, Mechoulam R. A novel probe for the cannabinoid receptor. J Med Chem. 1992;35:2065–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dincheva I, Drysdale AT, Hartley CA, Johnson DC, Jing D, King EC, Ra S, Gray JM, Yang R, DeGruccio AN, Huang C, Cravatt BF, Glatt CE, Hill MN, Casey BJ, Lee FS. FAAH genetic variation enhances fronto-amygdala function in mouse and human. Nat Commun. 2015;6:6395.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dinh TP, Carpenter D, Leslie FM, Freund TF, Katona I, Sensi SL, Kathuria S, Piomelli D. Brain monoglyceride lipase participating in endocannabinoid inactivation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:10819–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Dlugos AM, Hamidovic A, Hodgkinson CA, Goldman D, Palmer AA, de Wit H. More aroused, less fatigued: fatty acid amide hydrolase gene polymorphisms influence acute response to amphetamine. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010;35:613–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Esteban S, García-Sevilla JA. Effects induced by cannabinoids on monoaminergic systems in the brain and their implications for psychiatric disorders. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2012;38:78–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Galiègue S, Mary S, Marchand J, Dussossoy D, Carrière D, Carayon P, Bouaboula M, Shire D, Le Fur G, Casellas P. Expression of central and peripheral cannabinoid receptors in human immune tissues and leukocyte subpopulations. Eur J Biochem. 1995;232:54–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gobbi G, Bambico FR, Mangieri R, Bortolato M, Campolongo P, Solinas M, Cassano T, Morgese MG, Debonnel G, Duranti A, Tontini A, Tarzia G, Mor M, Trezza V, Goldberg SR, Cuomo V, Piomelli D. Antidepressant-like activity and modulation of brain monoaminergic transmission by blockade of anandamide hydrolysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:18620–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Haller J, Varga B, Ledent C, Barna I, Freund T. CB1 cannabinoid receptors mediate anxiolytic effects: context-dependent effects of CB1 canabinoid gene disruption on anxiety-like and social behavior in mice. Eur J Neurosci. 2004;16:1906–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Häring M, Enk V, Rey AA, Loch S, Ruiz de Azua I, Weber T, Bartsch D, Monory K, Lutz B. Cannabinoid type-1 receptor signaling in central serotonergic neurons regulates anxiety-like behavior and sociability. Front Behav Neurosci. 2015;9:235. (eCollection 2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Hegerl U, Gallinat J, Juckel G. Event-related potentials. Do they reflect central serotonergic neurotransmission and do they predict clinical response to serotonin agonists? J Affect Disord. 2001;62:93–100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hegerl U, Juckel G. Intensity dependence of auditory evoked potentials as an indicator of central serotonergic neurotransmission: a new hypothesis. Biol Psychiatry. 1993;33:173–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hill MN, Gorzalka BB. Is there a role for the endocannabinoid system in the etiology and treatment of melancholic depression? Behav Pharmacol. 2005;16:333–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hill MN, Ho WS, Sinopoli KJ, Viau V, Hillard CJ, Gorzalka BB. Involvement of the endocannabinoid system in the ability of long-term tricyclic antidepressant treatment to suppress stress-induced activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2006;31:2591–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hill MN, Miller GE, Carrier EJ, Gorzalka BB, Hillard CJ. Circulating endocannabinoids and N-acyl ethanolamines are differentially regulated in major depression and following exposure to social stress. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2009;34:1257–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Hill MN, Miller GE, Ho WS, Gorzalka BB, Hillard CJ. Serum endocannabinoid content is altered in females with depressive disorders: a preliminary report. Pharmacopsychiatry. 2008;41:48–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Horstmann S, Binder EB. Pharmacogenomics of antidepressant drugs. Pharmacol Ther. 2009;124:57–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 


  31. Ising M, Maccarrone G, Brückl T, Scheuer S, Hennings J, Holsboer F, Turck CW, Uhr M, Lucae S. FKBP5 gene expression predicts antidepressant treatment outcome in depression. Int J Mol Sci. 2019; 20(3):485.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Juckel G, Gallinat J, Riedel M, Sokullu S, Schulz C, Möller HJ, Müller N, Hegerl U. Serotonergic dysfunction in schizophrenia assessed by the loudness dependence measure of primary auditory cortex evoked activity. Schizophr Res. 2003;64:115–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Juckel G, Molnár M, Hegerl U, Csépe V, Karmos G. Auditory-evoked potentials as indicator of brain serotonergic activity–first evidence in behaving cats. Biol Psychiatry. 1997;41:1181–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Juhasz G, Lazary J, Chase D, Pegg E, Downey D, Toth ZG, Stones K, Platt H, Mekli K, Payton A, Anderson IM, Deakin JF, Bagdy G. Variations in the cannabinoid receptor 1 gene predispose to migraine. Neurosci Lett. 2009;461:116–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Karg K, Burmeister M, Shedden K, Sen S. The serotonin transporter promoter variant (5-HTTLPR), stress, and depression meta-analysis revisited: evidence of genetic moderation. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011;68(5):444-54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Koethe D, Llenos IC, Dulay JR, Hoyer C, Torrey EF, Leweke FM, Weis S. Expression of CB1 cannabinoid receptor in the anterior cingulate cortex in schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depression. J Neural Transm. 2007;114:1055–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Lazary J, Lazary A, Gonda X, Benko A, Molnar E, Hunyady L, Juhasz G, Bagdy G. Promoter variants of the cannabinoid receptor 1 gene (CNR1) in interaction with 5-HTTLPR affect the anxious phenotype. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2009;150:1118–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Lucki I. The spectrum of behaviors influenced by serotonin. Biol Psychiatry. 1998;44:151–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Mailleux P, Vanderhaeghen JJ. Dopaminergic regulation of cannabinoid receptor mRNA levels in the rat caudate-putamen: an in situ hybridization study. J Neurochem. 1993;61(5):1705–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Malone DT, Taylor DA. Involvement of somatodendritic 5-HT(1A) receptors in Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol-induced hypothermia in the rat. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2001;69:595–601.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Marco EM, Pérez-Alvarez L, Borcel E, Rubio M, Guaza C, Ambrosio E, File SE, Viveros MP. Involvement of 5-HT1A receptors in behavioural effects of the cannabinoid receptor agonist CP 55,940 in male rats. Behav Pharmacol. 2004;15:21–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. McKenna MT, Michaud CM, Murray CJ, Marks JS. Assessing the burden of disease in the United States using disability-adjusted life years. Am J Prev Med. 2005;28:415–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Mitjans M, Serretti A, Fabbri C, Gastó C, Catalán R, Fañanás L, Arias B. Psychopharmacology (Berl). Screening genetic variability at the CNR1 gene in both major depression etiology and clinical response to citalopram treatment. Psychopharmacology. 2013;227(3):509–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Monteleone P, Bifulco M, Maina G, Tortorella A, Gazzerro P, Proto MC, Di Filippo C, Monteleone F, Canestrelli B, Buonerba G, Bogetto F, Maj M. Investigation of CNR1 and FAAH endocannabinoid gene polymorphisms in bipolar disorder and major depression. Pharmacol Res. 2010;61:400–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Moreira FA, Crippa JA. The psychiatric side-effects of rimonabant. Rev Bras Psiquiatr. 2009;31:145–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Murillo-Rodríguez E. The role of the CB1 receptor in the regulation of sleep. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2008;32:1420–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Norra C, Mrazek M, Tuchtenhagen F, Gobbelé R, Buchner H, Sass H, Herpertz SC. Enhanced intensity dependence as a marker of low serotonergic neurotransmission in borderline personality disorder. J Psychiatr Res. 2003;37:23–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Owens MJ, Nemeroff CB. Role of serotonin in the pathophysiology of depression: focus on the serotonin transporter. Clin Chem. 1994;40:288–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Park Y-M, Lee S-H. Clinical usefulness of loudness dependence of auditory evoked potentials (LDAEP) in patients with bipolar disorder. Psychiatry Investig. 2013;10(3):233–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Russo EB, Burnett A, Hall B, Parker KK. Agonistic properties of cannabidiol at 5-HT1a receptors. Neurochem Res. 2005;30:1037–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Santarelli L, Saxe M, Gross C, Surget A, Battaglia F, Dulawa S, Weisstaub N, Lee J, Duman R, Arancio O, Belzung C, Hen R. Requirement of hippocampal neurogenesis for the behavioral effects of antidepressants. Science. 2003;301:805–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Schildkraut JJ. The catecholamine hypothesis of affective disorders: a review of supporting evidence. Am J Psychiatry. 1965;122(5):509–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Schloss P, Williams DC. The serotonin transporter: a primary target for antidepressant drugs. J Psychopharmacol. 1998;12:115–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Serra G, Fratta W. A possible role for the endocannabinoid system in the neurobiology of depression. Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2007;3:25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Sipe JC, Scott TM, Murray S, Harismendy O, Simon GM, Cravatt BF, Waalen J. Biomarkers of endocannabinoid system activation in severe obesity. PLoS ONE. 2010;5(1): e8792.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Umathe SN, Manna SS, Jain NS. Involvement of endocannabinoids in antidepressant and anti-compulsive effect of fluoxetine in mice. Behav Brain Res. 2011;223:125–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Vinod KY, Hungund BL. Role of the endocannabinoid system in depression and suicide. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2006;27:539–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Wang J, Shen R, Haj-Dahmane S. Endocannabinoids mediate the glucocorticoid-induced inhibition of excitatory synaptic transmission to dorsal raphe serotonin neurons. J Physiol. 2012;590:5795–808.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Ward SJ, Lefever TW, Jackson C, Tallarida RJ, Walker EA. Effects of a Cannabinoid1 receptor antagonist and Serotonin2C receptor agonist alone and in combination on motivation for palatable food: a dose-addition analysis study in mice. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2008;325:567–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Wutzler A, Winter C, Kitzrow W, Uhl I, Wolf RJ, Heinz A, Juckel G. Loudness dependence of auditory evoked potentials as indicator of central serotonergic neurotransmission: simultaneous electrophysiological recordings and in vivo microdialysis in the rat primary auditory ortex. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2008;33:3176–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Zoerner AA, Gutzki FM, Batkai S, May M, Rakers C, Engeli S, Jordan J, Tsikas D. Quantification of endocannabinoids in biological systems by chromatography and mass spectrometry: a comprehensive review from an analytical and biological perspective. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011;1811:706–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Zoerner AA, Batkai S, Suchy MT, Gutzki FM, Engeli S, Jordan J, Tsikas D. Simultaneous UPLC-MS/MS quantification of the endocannabinoids 2-arachidonoyl glycerol (2AG), 1-arachidonoyl glycerol (1AG), and anandamide in human plasma: minimization of matrix-effects, 2AG/1AG isomerization and degradation by toluene solvent extraction. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2012;883–884:161–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


We acknowledge support by the Open Access Publication Funds of the Ruhr-Universität Bochum.


Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. The work is supported by the LWL-University Hospital.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



All authors have made substantial contribution to the conception and design of the study, the acquisition of data, the interpretation of the results and the critical review of the article. All drafted the article and carried out the data analysis and take responsibility for the accuracy of the analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barbara Emons.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Ruhr–University Bochum. All participants agree with the collection and use of their data.

Consent for publication

The participants give their consent to publication of their data.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Emons, B., Arning, L., Makulla, VE. et al. Endocannabinergic modulation of central serotonergic activity in healthy human volunteers. Ann Gen Psychiatry 22, 11 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: